H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Sam Querrey vs Mikhail Youzhny H2H: 3-0
Sam Querrey holds a 3–0 lead over Mikhail Youzhny in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Sam Querrey leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sam Querrey won the 2018 New York fourth round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 38
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 44
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16, 2018* | New York | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Sam Querrey | 6-4 6-3 | Mikhail Youzhny | Match data |
| Oct 3, 2013* | Beijing | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Sam Querrey | 7-6(3) 6-3 | Mikhail Youzhny | Match data |
| Aug 16, 2007* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Sam Querrey | 5-7 6-3 6-4 | Mikhail Youzhny | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sam Querrey | #529 | #11 | 2,595 | 2,037 | 372 | 315 | 54.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 10 |
| Mikhail Youzhny | #115 | #8 | 3,500 | 2,069 | 477 | 405 | 54.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sam Querrey | Mikhail Youzhny | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #286 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2006 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #130 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #113 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2007 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #63 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #58 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2008 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #39 | 1,786 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #32 | 1,866 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2009 | 39–22 | 63.9% | #25 | 1,899 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #43 | 1,746 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2010 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #18 | 1,872 | 0 | 6 | 2004 | 38–25 | 60.3% | #16 | 1,870 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2011 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #93 | 1,816 | 0 | 6 | 2005 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #43 | 1,758 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2012 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #22 | 2,005 | 0 | 7 | 2006 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #24 | 1,803 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2013 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #46 | 1,877 | 0 | 7 | 2007 | 48–24 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,880 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2014 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #35 | 1,893 | 0 | 7 | 2008 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #32 | 1,761 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2015 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #59 | 1,810 | 0 | 7 | 2009 | 41–27 | 60.3% | #19 | 1,960 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2016 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #31 | 1,798 | 0 | 8 | 2010 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #10 | 1,936 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | 2017 | 35–20 | 63.6% | #13 | 1,943 | 0 | 10 | 2011 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #35 | 1,837 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | 2018 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #51 | 1,822 | 0 | 10 | 2012 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #25 | 1,902 | 0 | 8 |
| 31 | 2019 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #44 | 1,898 | 0 | 10 | 2013 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #15 | 2,016 | 0 | 10 |
| 32 | 2020 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #53 | 1,817 | 0 | 10 | 2014 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #48 | 1,795 | 0 | 10 |
| 33 | 2021 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #108 | 1,702 | 0 | 10 | 2015 | 9–24 | 27.3% | #127 | 1,701 | 0 | 10 |
| 34 | 2022 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #329 | 1,649 | 0 | 10 | 2016 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #57 | 1,774 | 0 | 10 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #84 | 1,679 | 0 | 10 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #115 | 1,637 | 0 | 10 |