H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Sam Querrey vs Nicolas Almagro H2H: 2-6

Nicolas Almagro holds a 6–2 lead over Sam Querrey in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Nicolas Almagro leads 3–2 on hard courts and 3–0 on clay. Most recently, Nicolas Almagro won the 2014 Houston semifinal W/O.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sam Querrey
USA Age 38 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
2 – 6
8 main draw meetings
Nicolas Almagro
ESP Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 12, 2014* Houston ATP 250 SF Clay Nicolas Almagro #20 (w/o) Sam Querrey #82 Match data
Mar 22, 2014* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Nicolas Almagro #19 6-4 6-4 Sam Querrey #62 Match data
Oct 25, 2012* Valencia ATP 250 R16 Hard Nicolas Almagro #12 6-4 6-7(4) 6-0 Sam Querrey #23 Match data
May 16, 2012* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Nicolas Almagro #13 7-5 6-2 Sam Querrey #89 Match data
Mar 11, 2012* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Nicolas Almagro #12 5-7 6-4 6-4 Sam Querrey #85 Match data
May 11, 2011* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Nicolas Almagro #10 6-3 7-6(4) Sam Querrey #25 Match data
Sep 5, 2010* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Sam Querrey #22 6-3 6-4 6-4 Nicolas Almagro #16 Match data
Jan 17, 2009* Auckland ATP 250 QF Hard Sam Querrey #36 6-3 6-2 Nicolas Almagro #18 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sam Querrey #529 #11 2,595 2,037 372 315 54.1% 0 0 0 2 8 10
Nicolas Almagro #846 #9 2,735 2,076 385 272 58.6% 0 0 0 2 11 13

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sam Querrey Nicolas Almagro
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2003 1–1 50.0% #156 1,511 0 0
18 2006 6–11 35.3% #130 1,540 0 0 2004 2–7 22.2% #103 1,539 0 0
19 2007 19–22 46.3% #63 1,636 0 0 2005 13–22 37.1% #114 1,551 0 0
20 2008 28–23 54.9% #39 1,786 0 1 2006 27–20 57.4% #32 1,721 0 1
21 2009 39–22 63.9% #25 1,899 0 2 2007 32–27 54.2% #28 1,723 0 2
22 2010 35–21 62.5% #18 1,872 0 6 2008 34–16 68.0% #18 1,794 0 4
23 2011 12–13 48.0% #93 1,816 0 6 2009 30–24 55.6% #26 1,831 0 5
24 2012 37–24 60.7% #22 2,005 0 7 2010 41–23 64.1% #15 1,885 0 7
25 2013 25–21 54.3% #46 1,877 0 7 2011 47–23 67.1% #10 1,874 0 10
26 2014 26–20 56.5% #35 1,893 0 7 2012 51–21 70.8% #11 2,010 0 12
27 2015 20–24 45.5% #59 1,810 0 7 2013 42–23 64.6% #13 1,961 0 12
28 2016 28–23 54.9% #31 1,798 0 8 2014 15–10 60.0% #71 1,928 0 12
29 2017 35–20 63.6% #13 1,943 0 10 2015 18–20 47.4% #73 1,795 0 12
30 2018 21–22 48.8% #51 1,822 0 10 2016 22–22 50.0% #44 1,790 0 13
31 2019 24–17 58.5% #44 1,898 0 10 2017 10–12 45.5% #151 1,833 0 13
32 2020 3–6 33.3% #53 1,817 0 10 2018 0–1 0.0% #846 1,777 0 13
33 2021 10–16 38.5% #108 1,702 0 10 — — — — — — —
34 2022 4–10 28.6% #329 1,649 0 10 — — — — — — —