H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Sam Querrey vs Radek Stepanek H2H: 2-1
Sam Querrey holds a 2–1 lead over Radek Stepanek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Sam Querrey leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Radek Stepanek won the 2012 Memphis quarterfinal 7-6(5) 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 38
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 47
Right-Handed
186 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2012* | Memphis | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Radek Stepanek | 7-6(5) 6-0 | Sam Querrey | Match data |
| May 12, 2009* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Sam Querrey | 7-6(2) 5-2 (ret.) | Radek Stepanek | Match data |
| Mar 15, 2009* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Sam Querrey | 6-4 6-3 | Radek Stepanek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sam Querrey | #529 | #11 | 2,595 | 2,037 | 372 | 315 | 54.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 10 |
| Radek Stepanek | #492 | #8 | 2,700 | 2,034 | 366 | 283 | 56.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sam Querrey | Radek Stepanek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2006 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #130 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2007 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #63 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #165 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2008 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #39 | 1,786 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #169 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2009 | 39–22 | 63.9% | #25 | 1,899 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2010 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #18 | 1,872 | 0 | 6 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #542 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2011 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #93 | 1,816 | 0 | 6 | 2002 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #63 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2012 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #22 | 2,005 | 0 | 7 | 2003 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #46 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2013 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #46 | 1,877 | 0 | 7 | 2004 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #33 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2014 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #35 | 1,893 | 0 | 7 | 2005 | 45–26 | 63.4% | #20 | 1,840 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2015 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #59 | 1,810 | 0 | 7 | 2006 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,865 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2016 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #31 | 1,798 | 0 | 8 | 2007 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #30 | 1,863 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2017 | 35–20 | 63.6% | #13 | 1,943 | 0 | 10 | 2008 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #27 | 1,837 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2018 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #51 | 1,822 | 0 | 10 | 2009 | 44–19 | 69.8% | #12 | 2,010 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2019 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #44 | 1,898 | 0 | 10 | 2010 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #62 | 1,872 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 2020 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #53 | 1,817 | 0 | 10 | 2011 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #28 | 1,880 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | 2021 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #108 | 1,702 | 0 | 10 | 2012 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #31 | 1,930 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | 2022 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #329 | 1,649 | 0 | 10 | 2013 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #44 | 1,828 | 0 | 5 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #68 | 1,801 | 0 | 5 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #197 | 1,766 | 0 | 5 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #107 | 1,866 | 0 | 5 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #354 | 1,900 | 0 | 5 |