H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Sam Querrey vs Rajeev Ram H2H: 4-1

Sam Querrey holds a 4–1 lead over Rajeev Ram in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Sam Querrey leads 4–0 on hard courts, while Rajeev Ram leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Sam Querrey won the 2016 Delray Beach Open final 6-4 7-6(6).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sam Querrey
USA Age 38 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main draw meetings
Rajeev Ram
USA Age 42 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sam Querrey #61 6-4 7-6(6) Rajeev Ram #89 Match data Feb 21, 2016* F Delray Beach Open ATP 250 Hard
Sam Querrey #57 6-3 7-6(4) Rajeev Ram #117 Match data Jul 28, 2012* SF Los Angeles Open ATP 250 Hard
Sam Querrey #31 6-2 6-3 Rajeev Ram #82 Match data Feb 18, 2010* R32 Memphis ATP 500 Hard
Sam Querrey #37 7-5 6-3 Rajeev Ram #108 Match data Jul 23, 2009* R16 Indianapolis ATP 250 Hard
Rajeev Ram #181 6-7(3) 7-5 6-3 Sam Querrey #39 Match data Jul 12, 2009* F Newport ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sam Querrey #529 #11 2,595 2,038 372 316 54.1% 0 0 0 2 8 10
Rajeev Ram #1,076 #56 826 1,747 57 94 37.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sam Querrey Rajeev Ram
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2006 6–11 35.3% #130 1,541 0 0 2002 0–1 0.0% — 1,479 0 0
19 2007 19–22 46.3% #63 1,637 0 0 2003 1–1 50.0% — 1,492 0 0
20 2008 28–24 53.8% #39 1,778 0 1 2004 1–3 25.0% #297 1,474 0 0
21 2009 39–22 63.9% #25 1,900 0 2 2005 2–2 50.0% #195 1,490 0 0
22 2010 35–21 62.5% #18 1,872 0 6 2006 0–1 0.0% #197 1,457 0 0
23 2011 12–13 48.0% #93 1,817 0 6 2007 0–1 0.0% #253 1,417 0 0
24 2012 37–24 60.7% #22 2,005 0 7 2008 2–4 33.3% #190 1,478 0 0
25 2013 25–21 54.3% #46 1,875 0 7 2009 8–6 57.1% #79 1,587 0 1
26 2014 26–20 56.5% #35 1,896 0 7 2010 6–18 25.0% #184 1,591 0 1
27 2015 20–24 45.5% #59 1,812 0 7 2011 2–3 40.0% #149 1,606 0 1
28 2016 28–23 54.9% #31 1,797 0 8 2012 7–9 43.8% #132 1,636 0 1
29 2017 35–20 63.6% #13 1,944 0 10 2013 4–11 26.7% #127 1,646 0 1
30 2018 21–22 48.8% #51 1,823 0 10 2014 3–7 30.0% #139 1,660 0 1
31 2019 24–17 58.5% #44 1,898 0 10 2015 7–6 53.8% #89 1,654 0 2
32 2020 3–6 33.3% #53 1,818 0 10 2016 12–19 38.7% #129 1,616 0 2
33 2021 10–16 38.5% #108 1,689 0 10 2017 2–2 50.0% #353 1,582 0 2
34 2022 4–10 28.6% #329 1,644 0 10 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sam Querrey Rajeev Ram
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2006 5 10 15 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2007 18 14 32 56.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2003 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2008 23 16 39 59.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2004 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 2009 30 14 44 68.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — 2005 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2010 19 14 33 57.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — — 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2011 8 8 16 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2012 28 16 44 63.6% 2 4 6 33.3% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — 2008 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2013 21 14 35 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2009 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 5 1 6 83.3% — — — —
26 2014 16 14 30 53.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2010 4 12 16 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
27 2015 8 15 23 34.8% 6 5 11 54.5% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 2011 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2016 16 14 30 53.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — 2012 4 8 12 33.3% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
29 2017 23 13 36 63.9% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 2013 2 8 10 20.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
30 2018 16 16 32 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2014 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
31 2019 13 14 27 48.1% 3 1 4 75.0% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — 2015 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 5 0 5 100.0% — — — —
32 2020 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2016 9 11 20 45.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
33 2021 2 9 11 18.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 8 5 13 61.5% — — — — 2017 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
34 2022 1 5 6 16.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 250 210 460 54.3% 44 57 101 43.6% 78 47 125 62.4% 0 2 2 0.0% — 34 71 105 32.4% 4 7 11 36.4% 19 16 35 54.3% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 684/688 of Sam Querrey's and 150/151 of Rajeev Ram's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Sam Querrey Rajeev Ram
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2006 17/17 11.4 3.2 57.2% 75.9% 49.8% 62.8% 42.9% 64.6% 34.0% 2002 1/1 3.0 3.0 41.5% 55.6% 47.4% 60.0% 50.0% 50.8% 31.6%
19 2007 41/41 12.4 3.2 56.6% 79.2% 48.3% 59.9% 39.4% 65.8% 33.9% 2003 2/2 4.5 7.0 45.7% 78.9% 42.5% 55.0% 52.8% 59.1% 39.8%
20 2008 51/52 10.2 3.2 59.1% 74.3% 49.1% 61.1% 41.2% 64.2% 35.5% 2004 4/4 4.8 5.0 54.3% 75.1% 44.7% 56.9% 44.6% 61.5% 28.2%
21 2009 61/61 11.8 3.0 59.4% 80.0% 53.4% 60.4% 44.4% 69.2% 36.2% 2005 4/4 11.3 3.8 54.9% 75.5% 45.8% 56.4% 54.3% 62.1% 34.7%
22 2010 56/56 12.3 3.4 61.5% 79.4% 50.9% 64.4% 45.2% 68.3% 35.1% 2006 1/1 2.0 1.0 68.9% 74.5% 34.8% 0.0% 100.0% 62.2% 26.5%
23 2011 25/25 8.9 3.2 59.6% 74.8% 51.2% 66.6% 31.2% 65.2% 34.4% 2007 1/1 6.0 4.0 59.0% 71.4% 52.9% 55.6% 33.3% 63.9% 41.8%
24 2012 61/61 11.6 3.9 57.6% 80.5% 51.1% 60.0% 42.0% 68.1% 36.0% 2008 6/6 6.0 1.5 63.5% 69.6% 41.8% 45.8% 44.2% 59.3% 32.5%
25 2013 45/46 12.8 3.6 59.6% 78.6% 48.7% 57.6% 35.7% 66.5% 33.6% 2009 14/14 9.1 2.6 58.3% 77.3% 53.3% 73.2% 36.0% 67.3% 33.0%
26 2014 45/46 14.4 2.8 60.5% 79.4% 51.9% 73.7% 41.8% 68.7% 33.8% 2010 24/24 10.2 3.3 58.5% 71.2% 47.0% 42.4% 32.4% 61.1% 28.1%
27 2015 44/44 13.8 3.6 59.5% 78.7% 54.4% 64.0% 37.1% 68.9% 33.7% 2011 5/5 4.2 2.0 62.1% 70.2% 44.7% 44.7% 54.2% 61.1% 30.3%
28 2016 51/51 13.1 3.1 58.6% 79.9% 52.3% 59.4% 39.6% 68.5% 33.4% 2012 16/16 5.1 2.5 58.3% 74.9% 48.0% 58.8% 40.8% 63.4% 33.3%
29 2017 55/55 13.5 3.2 57.1% 79.8% 51.8% 62.5% 49.5% 67.9% 37.0% 2013 15/15 7.4 2.6 61.6% 69.7% 46.1% 58.8% 39.6% 60.8% 33.6%
30 2018 43/43 14.3 3.7 58.2% 81.9% 51.7% 60.0% 41.2% 69.3% 34.2% 2014 10/10 6.1 2.8 62.0% 70.2% 48.9% 62.0% 32.6% 62.2% 31.9%
31 2019 41/41 16.8 4.0 62.1% 81.2% 49.4% 60.5% 33.2% 69.1% 33.8% 2015 13/13 9.8 2.4 63.0% 75.6% 53.0% 65.0% 44.1% 67.1% 31.1%
32 2020 9/9 16.8 3.6 60.3% 78.2% 50.8% 33.4% 31.7% 67.5% 31.1% 2016 30/31 7.2 3.0 63.5% 72.6% 50.5% 60.9% 35.2% 64.4% 33.3%
33 2021 25/26 15.2 5.2 56.8% 81.9% 47.7% 52.4% 33.2% 67.3% 30.3% 2017 4/4 6.8 4.3 55.8% 74.6% 53.0% 69.8% 22.4% 65.2% 32.7%
34 2022 14/14 12.4 4.7 58.3% 78.6% 46.1% 56.3% 26.6% 64.8% 29.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 684/688 12.9 3.5 59.0% 79.2% 50.9% 61.3% 40.2% 67.6% 34.5% — 150/151 7.6 2.9 60.2% 72.8% 48.6% 57.4% 38.6% 63.1% 32.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sam Querrey Rajeev Ram
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2005 1490 99.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1486 99.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2006 1542 124.2 +1.62 -2.01 0.962 49.2% -13 — — 46.7% -0.31 1–7 (13%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.03 2002 1479 99.7 +2.35 +0.19 0.641 41.8% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.13
19 2007 1637 141.5 +2.16 -1.29 0.990 50.0% +50 -158 — 47.6% -0.08 6–8 (43%) 9–10 (47%) — +0.09 2003 1493 105.3 -0.85 +0.13 0.972 50.4% — — — 50.0% +0.50 — — — -0.02
20 2008 1779 145.5 +1.02 -0.70 0.993 50.1% +29 -209 -254 51.5% +0.04 11–8 (58%) 9–8 (53%) — +0.64 2004 1474 102.9 -3.28 -0.64 0.731 44.5% +28 — — 27.3% -1.55 1–0 1–1 — +0.23
21 2009 1900 149.0 +4.79 +0.01 1.176 52.3% +27 -361 -223 62.0% +0.61 8–11 (42%) 13–12 (52%) — +1.27 2005 1490 105.6 -0.27 -2.37 0.916 49.5% +13 — — 54.5% 0.00 0–1 3–1 (75%) — +0.22
22 2010 1873 152.2 +3.95 -0.55 1.108 51.9% +5 -250 +9 58.4% +0.58 13–11 (54%) 14–17 (45%) — +2.65 2006 1458 100.0 +0.64 -0.34 0.700 45.1% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — -0.05
23 2011 1817 141.7 +1.37 -1.06 0.989 49.9% +19 -173 +81 46.7% -0.10 3–4 (43%) 4–7 (36%) — +0.50 2007 1418 101.5 -4.12 -2.14 1.157 51.3% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 — — +0.10
24 2012 2006 157.4 +4.09 +0.39 1.129 52.1% +3 -305 -92 57.8% +0.40 12–10 (55%) 20–13 (61%) — -0.61 2008 1479 114.5 -1.05 -1.49 0.798 46.4% +22 — — 40.0% -0.80 0–1 3–3 (50%) — +0.19
25 2013 1875 153.6 +2.58 -2.07 1.003 50.0% +71 -164 -51 50.0% -0.07 9–8 (53%) 15–15 (50%) — +0.18 2009 1587 122.4 +1.13 -1.70 1.010 50.2% -72 — +148 52.8% +0.11 3–1 (75%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.97
26 2014 1896 144.5 +3.69 -2.25 1.080 51.0% +17 -178 -23 56.4% +0.33 6–9 (40%) 12–12 (50%) — +0.27 2010 1592 116.0 -1.64 -5.51 0.722 44.9% -24 — +108 33.3% -1.42 3–6 (33%) 7–6 (54%) — +0.56
27 2015 1812 152.4 +3.52 -1.09 1.082 51.0% -39 -68 +110 46.7% -0.02 7–9 (44%) 13–18 (42%) — -2.68 2011 1606 115.8 -0.85 -2.60 0.778 45.9% +3 — — 50.0% -0.50 1–1 0–1 — +0.01
28 2016 1797 152.8 +4.13 -1.97 1.060 50.9% -38 -84 +223 56.0% +0.27 8–9 (47%) 18–16 (53%) — +1.80 2012 1636 116.2 -0.05 -3.04 0.910 48.7% -41 — +70 46.9% -0.37 0–1 4–3 (57%) — +1.50
29 2017 1945 161.8 +4.11 +1.06 1.153 52.3% -43 -192 +131 59.1% +0.70 11–6 (65%) 14–13 (52%) — +1.92 2013 1647 124.3 -1.42 -2.56 0.856 47.5% -6 — +7 40.0% -0.65 0–5 (0%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.29
30 2018 1823 152.3 +4.08 -0.93 1.114 51.7% -5 -127 +252 54.1% +0.58 6–11 (35%) 9–20 (31%) — +1.23 2014 1661 116.5 -1.88 -1.96 0.844 47.1% 0 — — 30.4% -1.13 2–1 (67%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.65
31 2019 1898 146.9 +4.59 -1.49 1.095 51.3% -82 -158 +201 55.6% +0.20 5–5 (50%) 18–15 (55%) — -0.90 2015 1654 122.8 +0.37 -2.07 0.944 49.7% -77 — +184 52.8% -0.14 4–3 (57%) 8–3 (73%) — +0.64
32 2020 1818 128.8 +2.33 -0.47 0.956 48.3% -33 — — 37.0% -0.67 1–1 4–3 (57%) — -0.60 2016 1617 133.1 -0.28 -2.91 0.934 49.1% +29 -87 +110 40.3% -0.65 3–4 (43%) 12–5 (71%) — +0.66
33 2021 1690 124.0 +2.41 -3.84 0.926 48.7% -54 — +303 39.1% -0.53 3–5 (38%) 8–8 (50%) — -0.24 2017 1583 110.5 +0.38 -1.49 0.939 48.0% — -27 — 44.4% -0.78 1–0 2–0 — +0.44
34 2022 1645 117.4 -0.20 -3.77 0.835 47.4% -72 — +250 28.6% -0.97 2–1 (67%) 2–7 (22%) — +0.03 2018 1563 95.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1551 95.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2039 155.6 +3.33 -1.02 1.064 51.0% 0 -181 +77 53.2% +0.22 112–123 (48%) 184–198 (48%) 96.0 +0.81 — 1748 123.1 -0.63 -2.79 0.869 47.8% -13 -67 +107 41.7% -0.67 18–26 (41%) 44–31 (59%) 104.5 +4.17

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.