H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Sam Querrey vs Rajeev Ram H2H: 4-1
Sam Querrey holds a 4–1 lead over Rajeev Ram in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Sam Querrey leads 4–0 on hard courts, while Rajeev Ram leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Sam Querrey won the 2016 Delray Beach final 6-4 7-6(6).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 38
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
4
–
1
5 main draw meetings
USA
Age 42
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2016* | Delray Beach | ATP 250 | F | Hard | Sam Querrey | 6-4 7-6(6) | Rajeev Ram | Match data |
| Jul 28, 2012* | Los Angeles | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Sam Querrey | 6-3 7-6(4) | Rajeev Ram | Match data |
| Feb 18, 2010* | Memphis | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Sam Querrey | 6-2 6-3 | Rajeev Ram | Match data |
| Jul 19, 2009 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Sam Querrey | 7-5 6-3 | Rajeev Ram | Match data |
| Jul 12, 2009* | Newport | ATP 250 | F | Grass | Rajeev Ram | 6-7(3) 7-5 6-3 | Sam Querrey | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sam Querrey | #529 | #11 | 2,595 | 2,037 | 372 | 315 | 54.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 10 |
| Rajeev Ram | #1,076 | #56 | 826 | 1,747 | 57 | 94 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sam Querrey | Rajeev Ram | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2006 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #130 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #536 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2007 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #63 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #437 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2008 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #39 | 1,786 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #297 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2009 | 39–22 | 63.9% | #25 | 1,899 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #195 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2010 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #18 | 1,872 | 0 | 6 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #197 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2011 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #93 | 1,816 | 0 | 6 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #253 | 1,417 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2012 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #22 | 2,005 | 0 | 7 | 2008 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #190 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2013 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #46 | 1,877 | 0 | 7 | 2009 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #79 | 1,579 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2014 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #35 | 1,893 | 0 | 7 | 2010 | 6–18 | 25.0% | #184 | 1,590 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2015 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #59 | 1,810 | 0 | 7 | 2011 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #149 | 1,605 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2016 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #31 | 1,798 | 0 | 8 | 2012 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #132 | 1,635 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2017 | 35–20 | 63.6% | #13 | 1,943 | 0 | 10 | 2013 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #127 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2018 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #51 | 1,822 | 0 | 10 | 2014 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #139 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2019 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #44 | 1,898 | 0 | 10 | 2015 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #89 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2020 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #53 | 1,817 | 0 | 10 | 2016 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #129 | 1,615 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2021 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #108 | 1,702 | 0 | 10 | 2017 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #353 | 1,582 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | 2022 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #329 | 1,649 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |