H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Sam Querrey vs Tommy Haas H2H: 2-4

Tommy Haas holds a 4–2 lead over Sam Querrey in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Tommy Haas leads 3–2 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tommy Haas won the 2013 Shanghai Masters second round 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sam Querrey
USA Age 38 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
2 – 4
6 main draw meetings
Tommy Haas
GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 9, 2013* Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Tommy Haas #12 6-4 6-4 Sam Querrey #31 Match data
Aug 1, 2009* Los Angeles ATP 250 SF Hard Sam Querrey #32 6-3 7-5 Tommy Haas #22 Match data
Feb 19, 2009* Memphis ATP 250 R32 Hard Sam Querrey #37 7-6(4) 6-4 Tommy Haas #61 Match data
Apr 12, 2007* Houston ATP 250 R32 Clay Tommy Haas #10 3-6 6-3 7-5 Sam Querrey #67 Match data
Feb 24, 2007* Memphis ATP 250 QF Hard Tommy Haas #9 6-2 6-2 Sam Querrey #92 Match data
Jan 28, 2007 Delray Beach ATP 250 RR Hard Tommy Haas #12 6-4 7-5 Sam Querrey #129 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sam Querrey #529 #11 2,595 2,037 372 315 54.1% 0 0 0 2 8 10
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,103 533 330 61.8% 0 1 0 3 11 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sam Querrey Tommy Haas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2006 6–11 35.3% #130 1,540 0 0 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,587 0 0
19 2007 19–22 46.3% #63 1,636 0 0 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,721 0 0
20 2008 28–23 54.9% #39 1,786 0 1 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,840 0 0
21 2009 39–22 63.9% #25 1,899 0 2 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,859 0 1
22 2010 35–21 62.5% #18 1,872 0 6 2000 27–20 57.4% #23 1,777 0 1
23 2011 12–13 48.0% #93 1,816 0 6 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,009 0 5
24 2012 37–24 60.7% #22 2,005 0 7 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,849 0 5
25 2013 25–21 54.3% #46 1,877 0 7 — — — — — — —
26 2014 26–20 56.5% #35 1,893 0 7 2004 35–18 66.0% #17 1,909 0 7
27 2015 20–24 45.5% #59 1,810 0 7 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,766 0 7
28 2016 28–23 54.9% #31 1,798 0 8 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,893 0 10
29 2017 35–20 63.6% #13 1,943 0 10 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,892 0 11
30 2018 21–22 48.8% #51 1,822 0 10 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,855 0 11
31 2019 24–17 58.5% #44 1,898 0 10 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,913 0 12
32 2020 3–6 33.3% #53 1,817 0 10 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,844 0 12
33 2021 10–16 38.5% #108 1,702 0 10 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,762 0 12
34 2022 4–10 28.6% #329 1,649 0 10 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,966 0 13
35 — — — — — — — 2013 46–23 66.7% #12 2,011 0 15
36 — — — — — — — 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,904 0 15
37 — — — — — — — 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,784 0 15
39 — — — — — — — 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,686 0 15