H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Sandon Stolle vs Cheng Fong Chang H2H: 1-0

Sandon Stolle holds a 1–0 lead over Cheng Fong Chang in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sandon Stolle leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Sandon Stolle won the 1992 Taipei round of 32 7-6(3) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sandon Stolle
AUS Age 56 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Cheng Fong Chang
CHN Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sandon Stolle #69 7-6(3) 6-2 Cheng Fong Chang #1124 Match data Oct 22, 1992* R32 Taipei ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sandon Stolle #1,379 #50 810 1,745 100 120 45.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cheng Fong Chang #985 #940 6 1,500 0 1 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Sandon Stolle Cheng Fong Chang
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1989 0–1 0.0% #813 1,485 0 0 1992 0–1 0.0% #1074 1,488 0 0
1990 2–3 40.0% #228 1,513 0 0 — — — — — — —
1991 5–7 41.7% #156 1,541 0 0 — — — — — — —
1992 19–20 48.7% #71 1,606 0 0 — — — — — — —
1993 8–19 29.6% #182 1,577 0 0 — — — — — — —
1994 4–6 40.0% #212 1,608 0 0 — — — — — — —
1995 7–9 43.8% #179 1,614 0 0 — — — — — — —
1996 24–20 54.5% #58 1,684 0 0 — — — — — — —
1997 22–19 53.7% #83 1,729 0 0 — — — — — — —
1998 6–12 33.3% #238 1,622 0 0 — — — — — — —
1999 3–4 42.9% #375 1,618 0 0 — — — — — — —

Performance Progression by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 175/214 of Sandon Stolle's and 1/1 of Cheng Fong Chang's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Sandon Stolle Cheng Fong Chang
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
1991 9/12 7.7 9.8 55.4% 70.7% 45.6% 64.3% 47.6% 59.5% 35.9% 1992 1/1 4.0 2.0 43.1% 60.7% 54.1% 57.1% 33.3% 56.9% 34.2%
1992 32/39 5.9 5.5 55.4% 72.2% 46.8% 50.8% 46.6% 61.1% 35.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
1993 22/27 6.0 6.7 52.4% 72.6% 42.1% 52.9% 49.8% 58.1% 33.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
1994 8/10 6.4 4.9 62.3% 70.2% 40.8% 58.6% 35.6% 59.1% 38.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
1995 14/16 7.0 6.0 60.8% 70.2% 46.3% 46.2% 33.4% 60.8% 35.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
1996 35/44 6.1 4.6 58.2% 73.8% 44.3% 52.9% 37.6% 61.5% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
1997 36/41 7.7 4.8 57.4% 75.0% 46.8% 55.8% 35.7% 63.2% 37.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
1998 14/18 6.0 2.9 60.9% 72.4% 46.4% 52.1% 33.9% 62.2% 38.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
1999 5/7 8.6 5.0 59.9% 74.7% 44.4% 58.8% 31.6% 63.3% 33.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career 175/220 6.6 5.3 57.3% 72.9% 45.2% 53.5% 40.0% 61.2% 36.3% Career 1/1 4.0 2.0 43.1% 60.7% 54.1% 57.1% 33.3% 56.9% 34.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Sandon Stolle Cheng Fong Chang
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1989 1485 100.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.19 1992 1489 99.0 -3.12 -0.60 0.794 44.7% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — +0.07
1990 1513 114.1 — — — — +39 — — 50.0% -1.00 0–2 1–0 — -0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1991 1541 114.1 -1.27 -0.64 0.887 48.1% +5 — — 41.7% -0.56 4–3 (57%) 4–8 (33%) 100.2 +0.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1992 1607 127.6 -0.48 -1.69 0.902 48.3% -23 — +85 48.4% +0.10 7–4 (64%) 7–9 (44%) 104.6 +1.62 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1993 1578 122.0 -2.38 -2.07 0.801 46.1% 0 -77 +98 36.6% -1.01 4–6 (40%) 3–7 (30%) 97.1 -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1994 1608 125.5 -1.19 +0.52 0.927 48.7% -2 — — 38.5% -0.73 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1995 1614 122.4 -0.39 -0.62 0.913 48.7% -10 — +48 46.5% -0.12 3–4 (43%) 1–7 (13%) 94.9 -0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1996 1684 131.4 -0.42 -0.13 0.979 49.5% -48 -190 +102 50.9% +0.18 8–4 (67%) 6–9 (40%) 102.5 +0.89 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1997 1729 128.4 +1.11 -0.21 1.004 50.1% -49 -172 +73 54.8% +0.14 7–7 (50%) 13–4 (76%) 105.3 +0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1998 1622 124.1 -0.05 -0.07 1.018 50.6% +27 — — 43.2% -0.34 0–6 (0%) 5–4 (56%) 93.0 +0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1999 1619 118.5 -0.31 -1.92 0.903 48.6% +28 — — 52.2% 0.00 0–2 3–2 (60%) — +0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 1746 132.7 -0.41 -0.76 0.934 48.9% -15 -164 +83 47.2% -0.18 35–40 (47%) 44–53 (45%) 99.1 +1.46 Career 1500 99.5 -3.12 -0.60 0.794 44.7% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — +7.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.