H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Sandon Stolle vs Gilad Bloom H2H: 0-2
Gilad Bloom holds a 2–0 lead over Sandon Stolle in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Gilad Bloom leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Gilad Bloom won the 1992 Taipei fourth round 7-6(7) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 56
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
ISR
Age 59
Left-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 1992* | Taipei | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Gilad Bloom | 7-6(7) 6-4 | Sandon Stolle | Match data |
| Jan 3, 1991* | Adelaide | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Gilad Bloom | 6-7(4) 7-6(5) 6-4 | Sandon Stolle | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sandon Stolle | #1,379 | #50 | 810 | 1,745 | 100 | 120 | 45.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gilad Bloom | #1,295 | #61 | 524 | 1,750 | 82 | 103 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sandon Stolle | Gilad Bloom | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #385 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #813 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #452 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #228 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #152 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #156 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #139 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #71 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #210 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #182 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #105 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #212 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #66 | 1,735 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #179 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #125 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #58 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #137 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1997 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #83 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #167 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1998 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #238 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #217 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1999 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #375 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #407 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |