H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Sandon Stolle vs Jaime Oncins H2H: 1-0
Sandon Stolle holds a 1–0 lead over Jaime Oncins in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sandon Stolle leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sandon Stolle won the 1992 Australian Open first round 3-6 6-2 7-5 4-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 56
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 56
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 1992* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Sandon Stolle | 3-6 6-2 7-5 4-6 6-2 | Jaime Oncins | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sandon Stolle | #1,379 | #50 | 810 | 1,745 | 100 | 120 | 45.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jaime Oncins | #1,034 | #34 | 773 | 1,796 | 61 | 86 | 41.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sandon Stolle | Jaime Oncins | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #813 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #314 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #228 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #263 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #156 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #113 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #71 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #64 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #182 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #48 | 1,765 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1994 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #212 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 11–23 | 32.4% | #133 | 1,578 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1995 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #179 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #230 | 1,502 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1996 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #58 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #222 | 1,505 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1997 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #83 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,488 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1998 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #238 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #166 | 1,436 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1999 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #375 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #223 | 1,448 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1031 | 1,435 | 0 | 2 |