H2H data updated: 2026-10-17 00:00 UTC

Sandon Stolle vs Martin Damm Sr H2H: 1-0

Sandon Stolle holds a 1–0 lead over Martin Damm Sr in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sandon Stolle leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sandon Stolle won the 1992 Seoul round of 32 6-3 6-2.

AUS Age 56 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sandon Stolle #135 6-3 6-2 Martin Damm Sr Match data Apr 23, 1992* R32 Seoul ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sandon Stolle #1,379 #50 810 1,745 100 120 45.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Martin Damm Sr — — — 1,731 — — — 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Sandon Stolle Martin Damm Sr
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1989 0–1 0.0% #813 1,485 0 0 — — — — — — —
1990 2–3 40.0% #228 1,513 0 0 — — — — — — —
1991 5–7 41.7% #156 1,541 0 0 — — — — — — —
1992 19–20 48.7% #71 1,606 0 0 — — — — — — —
1993 8–19 29.6% #182 1,577 0 0 — — — — — — —
1994 4–6 40.0% #212 1,608 0 0 — — — — — — —
1995 7–9 43.8% #179 1,614 0 0 — — — — — — —
1996 24–20 54.5% #58 1,684 0 0 — — — — — — —
1997 22–19 53.7% #83 1,729 0 0 — — — — — — —
1998 6–12 33.3% #238 1,622 0 0 — — — — — — —
1999 3–4 42.9% #375 1,618 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Sandon Stolle Martin Damm Sr
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1989 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
1990 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
1991 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 1991 — — — — — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
1992 13 15 28 46.4% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1992 6 8 14 42.9% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
1993 6 13 19 31.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1993 7 11 18 38.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 6 14 57.1%
1994 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 7 12 19 36.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 7 11 36.4%
1995 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1995 7 13 20 35.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8%
1996 13 11 24 54.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 15 13 28 53.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 13 10 23 56.5%
1997 10 10 20 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — 1997 10 13 23 43.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 7 17 58.8%
1998 6 9 15 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1998 10 14 24 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9%
1999 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1999 5 9 14 35.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 6 11 17 35.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 58 78 136 42.6% 10 15 25 40.0% 27 21 48 56.2% 5 6 11 45.5% Career 74 107 181 40.9% 6 28 34 17.6% 22 24 46 47.8% 51 49 100 51.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Sandon Stolle Martin Damm Sr
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1989 1485 100.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.19 1989 1492 98.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.08
1990 1513 114.1 — — — — +39 — — 50.0% -1.00 0–2 1–0 — -0.30 1990 1478 98.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.15
1991 1541 114.1 -1.27 -0.64 0.887 48.1% +5 — — 41.7% -0.56 4–3 (57%) 4–8 (33%) 100.2 +0.54 1991 1504 104.7 — — — — +57 — — 57.1% +0.57 1–0 0–1 — +0.21
1992 1607 127.6 -0.48 -1.69 0.902 48.3% -23 — +85 48.4% +0.10 7–4 (64%) 7–9 (44%) 104.6 +1.62 1992 1546 125.4 — — — — +65 -88 — 35.1% -0.91 4–1 (80%) 2–5 (29%) 103.3 +0.26
1993 1578 122.0 -2.38 -2.07 0.801 46.1% 0 -77 +98 36.6% -1.01 4–6 (40%) 3–7 (30%) 97.1 -0.20 1993 1647 128.4 — — — — +28 -196 — 44.8% -0.40 6–6 (50%) 8–5 (62%) 105.4 +0.61
1994 1608 125.5 -1.19 +0.52 0.927 48.7% -2 — — 38.5% -0.73 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — -0.16 1994 1630 133.5 — — — — -23 -172 +21 44.4% -0.32 3–13 (19%) 9–10 (47%) 92.4 -0.61
1995 1614 122.4 -0.39 -0.62 0.913 48.7% -10 — +48 46.5% -0.12 3–4 (43%) 1–7 (13%) 94.9 -0.32 1995 1619 133.0 — — — — +8 — — 42.3% -0.55 9–8 (53%) 11–11 (50%) 102.9 -0.27
1996 1684 131.4 -0.42 -0.13 0.979 49.5% -48 -190 +102 50.9% +0.18 8–4 (67%) 6–9 (40%) 102.5 +0.89 1996 1709 139.5 — — — — +35 — -23 47.9% -0.08 13–8 (62%) 13–18 (42%) 102.9 +1.26
1997 1729 128.4 +1.11 -0.21 1.004 50.1% -49 -172 +73 54.8% +0.14 7–7 (50%) 13–4 (76%) 105.3 +0.02 1997 1694 135.4 — — — — +35 -281 +7 48.3% -0.18 8–7 (53%) 16–10 (62%) 105.2 +0.62
1998 1622 124.1 -0.05 -0.07 1.018 50.6% +27 — — 43.2% -0.34 0–6 (0%) 5–4 (56%) 93.0 +0.60 1998 1649 132.2 — — — — +16 — +23 42.9% -0.50 7–7 (50%) 8–11 (42%) 98.6 -0.31
1999 1619 118.5 -0.31 -1.92 0.903 48.6% +28 — — 52.2% 0.00 0–2 3–2 (60%) — +0.31 1999 1578 123.5 — — — — +27 -177 +52 39.1% -0.78 1–7 (13%) 3–5 (38%) 90.9 -0.57
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1615 127.5 — — — — -72 -159 +102 44.2% -0.34 7–3 (70%) 6–9 (40%) 105.2 +0.30
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1514 96.3 — — — — — — +91 15.0% -1.90 — 0–2 — +0.77
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1525 111.4 — — — — +15 — — 37.5% -0.75 — 1–1 — -0.13
Career 1746 132.7 -0.41 -0.76 0.934 48.9% -15 -164 +83 47.2% -0.18 35–40 (47%) 44–53 (45%) 99.1 +1.46 Career 1732 136.6 — — — — +17 -170 +36 43.3% -0.43 59–60 (50%) 77–88 (47%) 101.6 +0.62

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.