H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Sandon Stolle vs Takao Suzuki H2H: 1-0
Sandon Stolle holds a 1–0 lead over Takao Suzuki in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sandon Stolle leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sandon Stolle won the 1998 Tokyo second round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 56
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 49
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 1998* | Tokyo | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Sandon Stolle | 6-2 6-3 | Takao Suzuki | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sandon Stolle | #1,379 | #50 | 810 | 1,745 | 100 | 120 | 45.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Takao Suzuki | #1,016 | #102 | 470 | 1,669 | 23 | 34 | 40.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sandon Stolle | Takao Suzuki | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #813 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #487 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #228 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #517 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #156 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #272 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #71 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #115 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #182 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #262 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #212 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #160 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #179 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #225 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #58 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1997 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #83 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #205 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1998 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #238 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #212 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1999 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #375 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #272 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #471 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #241 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #509 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #282 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |