H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Sargis Sargsian vs Leander Paes H2H: 1-1
Sargis Sargsian and Leander Paes are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Leander Paes leads 1–0 on carpet, while Sargis Sargsian leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Sargis Sargsian won the 1997 Newport semifinal 7-6(3) 2-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARM
Age 53
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
IND
Age 53
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 1997* | Newport | ATP 250 | SF | Grass | Sargis Sargsian | 7-6(3) 2-6 6-3 | Leander Paes | Match data |
| Jan 30, 1997* | Shanghai | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Leander Paes | 7-6(2) 6-4 | Sargis Sargsian | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sargis Sargsian | #1,525 | #38 | 978 | 1,811 | 155 | 205 | 43.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Leander Paes | #1,102 | #73 | 611 | 1,727 | 48 | 74 | 39.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sargis Sargsian | Leander Paes | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #278 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1993 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #615 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #260 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #139 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #220 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #130 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1996 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #104 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #129 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1997 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #69 | 1,674 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #122 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1998 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #98 | 1,623 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #91 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1999 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #59 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #142 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2000 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #94 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #188 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2001 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #72 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #299 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2002 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #103 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #998 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2003 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #39 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1032 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2004 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #75 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2005 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #294 | 1,588 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1102 | 1,555 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #809 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |