H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Sargis Sargsian vs Leander Paes H2H: 1-1

Sargis Sargsian and Leander Paes are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Leander Paes leads 1–0 on carpet, while Sargis Sargsian leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Sargis Sargsian won the 1997 Newport semifinal 7-6(3) 2-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sargis Sargsian
ARM Age 53 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Leander Paes
IND Age 53 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sargis Sargsian #86 7-6(3) 2-6 6-3 Leander Paes #104 Match data Jul 12, 1997* SF Newport World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass
Leander Paes #122 7-6(2) 6-4 Sargis Sargsian #99 Match data Jan 30, 1997* R32 Shanghai Masters World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sargis Sargsian #1,525 #38 978 1,811 156 208 42.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Leander Paes #1,102 #73 611 1,737 53 77 40.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sargis Sargsian Leander Paes
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1991 1–2 33.3% #278 1,492 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1992 0–1 0.0% #194 1,486 0 0
20 1993 1–1 50.0% #615 1,514 0 0 1993 1–3 25.0% #260 1,483 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1994 2–3 40.0% #139 1,495 0 0
22 1995 2–2 50.0% #220 1,568 0 0 1995 3–9 25.0% #130 1,486 0 0
23 1996 4–6 40.0% #104 1,576 0 0 1996 13–11 54.2% #129 1,654 0 0
24 1997 18–23 43.9% #69 1,628 0 1 1997 13–18 41.9% #122 1,634 0 0
25 1998 18–25 41.9% #98 1,617 0 1 1998 13–10 56.5% #91 1,659 0 1
26 1999 21–23 47.7% #59 1,636 0 1 1999 3–9 25.0% #142 1,562 0 1
27 2000 15–26 36.6% #94 1,566 0 1 2000 3–6 33.3% #188 1,537 0 1
28 2001 16–19 45.7% #72 1,624 0 1 2001 1–2 33.3% #299 1,595 0 1
29 2002 13–19 40.6% #103 1,649 0 1 2002 0–1 0.0% #998 1,579 0 1
30 2003 28–26 51.9% #39 1,774 0 1 2003 0–1 0.0% #1032 1,571 0 1
31 2004 17–27 38.6% #75 1,697 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 2005 3–9 25.0% #294 1,589 0 1 2005 0–1 0.0% #1102 1,550 0 1
33 2006 0–2 0.0% #809 1,576 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sargis Sargsian Leander Paes
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1993 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
22 1995 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 0 6 6 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
23 1996 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1996 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1997 8 11 19 42.1% 2 5 7 28.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 1997 4 11 15 26.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 1 4 75.0%
25 1998 6 13 19 31.6% 5 6 11 45.5% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1998 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 1999 4 8 12 33.3% 11 9 20 55.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 1999 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
27 2000 6 12 18 33.3% 8 10 18 44.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2001 7 10 17 41.2% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
29 2002 7 10 17 41.2% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2003 13 12 25 52.0% 9 10 19 47.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2004 9 14 23 39.1% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2005 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2006 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 68 103 171 39.8% 45 58 103 43.7% 28 30 58 48.3% 15 17 32 46.9% — 25 50 75 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 18 13 31 58.1% 9 10 19 47.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 313/364 of Sargis Sargsian's and 106/129 of Leander Paes's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Sargis Sargsian Leander Paes
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 3/3 3.0 3.7 58.6% 71.0% 47.9% 77.5% 23.3% 61.5% 35.9%
20 1993 2/2 1.0 3.0 62.4% 56.6% 57.6% 68.3% 34.5% 57.6% 36.0% 1993 4/4 3.0 4.8 66.2% 67.5% 51.2% 45.8% 42.6% 61.8% 38.1%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1994 4/5 3.0 4.0 58.1% 73.3% 37.5% 40.8% 32.0% 58.1% 38.2%
22 1995 2/4 5.0 7.0 57.5% 78.7% 29.9% 46.7% 47.4% 58.4% 33.4% 1995 11/12 2.9 3.8 61.2% 64.3% 45.8% 55.8% 32.3% 57.2% 32.9%
23 1996 7/10 2.1 4.0 58.5% 69.3% 46.1% 51.7% 41.0% 60.0% 42.4% 1996 16/24 4.2 3.7 61.2% 68.8% 47.3% 55.1% 40.0% 60.6% 38.4%
24 1997 31/41 4.3 3.4 58.0% 66.1% 50.7% 54.6% 38.3% 59.6% 35.6% 1997 25/31 3.6 3.8 61.6% 74.3% 49.6% 58.7% 39.3% 64.9% 36.6%
25 1998 33/43 4.5 3.1 60.5% 71.0% 50.9% 61.1% 43.1% 63.0% 38.8% 1998 20/23 4.1 2.9 58.7% 71.2% 53.2% 70.8% 45.8% 63.8% 38.1%
26 1999 33/44 3.8 2.5 60.7% 70.1% 50.3% 68.4% 40.9% 62.0% 39.0% 1999 10/12 3.4 4.4 56.2% 71.4% 50.7% 61.7% 31.5% 62.2% 33.4%
27 2000 33/41 3.7 3.0 60.4% 66.5% 45.5% 55.1% 39.0% 58.0% 38.0% 2000 7/9 4.0 4.3 61.1% 65.9% 46.3% 44.5% 26.8% 58.0% 29.9%
28 2001 32/35 3.7 3.3 59.1% 68.7% 48.5% 54.0% 46.3% 60.2% 38.1% 2001 3/3 8.7 7.3 58.3% 70.9% 42.7% 53.6% 31.8% 59.1% 30.1%
29 2002 29/32 5.0 3.2 56.7% 67.3% 49.4% 51.7% 39.2% 59.6% 34.2% 2002 1/1 5.0 1.0 55.0% 54.5% 55.6% 20.0% — 55.0% 28.3%
30 2003 54/54 4.1 3.4 61.7% 69.5% 51.8% 57.0% 47.3% 62.8% 39.6% 2003 1/1 0.0 8.0 58.4% 61.0% 50.0% 66.7% 42.9% 56.4% 37.6%
31 2004 43/44 4.8 3.0 63.2% 67.8% 48.6% 52.9% 33.9% 60.3% 36.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2005 12/12 3.0 4.3 59.9% 56.7% 37.4% 46.5% 49.0% 48.7% 30.9% 2005 1/1 2.0 0.0 60.0% 66.7% 41.7% 42.9% 66.7% 56.7% 27.6%
33 2006 2/2 0.5 6.5 60.0% 56.3% 39.5% 57.7% 16.7% 49.5% 28.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 313/364 4.1 3.2 60.3% 67.9% 48.9% 56.3% 41.4% 60.3% 37.5% — 106/130 3.8 3.8 60.2% 70.2% 48.7% 58.3% 37.5% 61.7% 35.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sargis Sargsian Leander Paes
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1493 103.0 -1.66 +0.58 0.932 49.1% +36 — — 28.6% -0.43 1–0 0–1 — +0.26
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1486 102.2 — — — — — — — 25.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — -0.04
20 1993 1514 106.3 -1.99 -0.78 0.850 47.7% — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 1–1 — -0.04 1993 1483 104.5 -0.63 +0.03 0.998 49.6% +25 — — 36.4% -0.18 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.15
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1496 104.2 -1.44 -1.83 0.912 47.8% +3 — — 41.7% -0.92 0–1 2–0 — +0.34
22 1995 1568 112.7 -0.77 +0.75 0.802 46.7% +23 — — 40.0% -0.73 2–0 1–0 — -0.16 1995 1486 109.8 -2.61 -2.49 0.768 45.6% +14 — — 28.6% -1.29 1–2 (33%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.09
23 1996 1577 128.3 -1.13 +3.09 1.060 51.0% +44 — — 45.5% 0.00 0–2 0–2 — +0.38 1996 1655 129.5 -1.01 -0.14 0.975 49.4% -32 — -11 50.0% -0.11 4–1 (80%) 5–5 (50%) — +0.13
24 1997 1628 125.8 -1.73 -0.98 0.881 47.6% -2 -131 +80 42.7% -0.72 7–9 (44%) 10–6 (63%) — -0.39 1997 1634 115.9 +1.36 -1.27 1.044 50.5% -37 -94 +43 43.0% -0.43 4–5 (44%) 4–9 (31%) — +1.81
25 1998 1618 121.9 +0.65 +0.48 1.050 50.9% -61 -75 +114 46.4% -0.07 6–11 (35%) 8–12 (40%) — +1.49 1998 1660 131.9 +0.72 +0.24 1.053 51.4% -30 — +69 51.0% +0.26 2–2 (50%) 2–4 (33%) — +1.30
26 1999 1637 132.5 +0.09 +1.23 1.029 50.7% -86 +41 +71 49.1% -0.06 5–10 (33%) 9–8 (53%) — -0.70 1999 1562 108.9 -1.02 -2.19 0.884 47.9% -19 — +132 25.0% -1.18 1–1 1–4 (20%) — +0.75
27 2000 1566 128.7 -2.68 +0.64 0.906 47.9% -40 +100 +90 37.0% -0.66 5–8 (38%) 5–4 (56%) — +1.47 2000 1538 104.1 -1.46 -3.99 0.711 44.3% +15 — — 36.4% -1.23 0–1 3–1 (75%) — +0.88
28 2001 1625 130.0 -2.01 +0.60 0.956 49.3% -63 +51 +50 46.7% -0.18 5–7 (42%) 5–4 (56%) — +0.20 2001 1596 106.9 -0.83 -2.86 0.736 45.8% — — — 33.3% -0.67 — 0–1 — +0.48
29 2002 1650 127.4 -1.35 -1.75 0.846 47.0% -4 -26 -15 41.7% -0.71 5–5 (50%) 8–6 (57%) — -0.86 2002 1579 97.0 -2.95 -4.40 0.628 40.7% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.12
30 2003 1775 142.7 +1.40 +2.44 1.066 51.2% -3 -112 -142 53.7% +0.49 4–6 (40%) 4–8 (33%) — -1.63 2003 1572 104.5 +2.28 -1.66 0.864 47.8% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — -0.16
31 2004 1697 135.9 -1.71 +0.83 0.929 48.5% +25 -58 -94 40.7% -0.52 8–6 (57%) 8–6 (57%) — -2.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2005 1589 91.9 -8.24 -4.38 0.602 40.3% +84 +23 -61 22.2% -2.26 1–0 1–2 (33%) — +0.23 2005 1551 95.8 -1.30 -1.39 0.637 42.4% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — +0.29
33 2006 1577 106.8 -0.31 -1.11 0.571 39.8% — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — -0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1812 135.5 -1.06 +0.48 0.943 48.9% -15 -12 +31 44.2% -0.34 49–64 (43%) 60–59 (50%) 99.6 -0.72 — 1738 121.9 -0.33 -1.21 0.934 48.8% -15 -94 +47 40.3% -0.54 14–15 (48%) 20–31 (39%) 96.9 +4.92

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.