H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Sargis Sargsian vs Mark Woodforde H2H: 0-2
Mark Woodforde holds a 2–0 lead over Sargis Sargsian in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mark Woodforde leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mark Woodforde won the 1998 Shanghai fourth round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARM
Age 53
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 60
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 1998* | Shanghai | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Mark Woodforde | 6-2 6-2 | Sargis Sargsian | Match data |
| Aug 19, 1993* | New Haven | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Mark Woodforde | 6-3 6-3 | Sargis Sargsian | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sargis Sargsian | #1,525 | #38 | 978 | 1,811 | 155 | 205 | 43.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mark Woodforde | #985 | #19 | 1,291 | 1,922 | 313 | 294 | 51.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sargis Sargsian | Mark Woodforde | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #127 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1993 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #615 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #181 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #67 | 1,648 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1995 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #220 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #42 | 1,800 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1996 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #104 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #75 | 1,710 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1997 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #69 | 1,674 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,716 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1998 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #98 | 1,623 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #88 | 1,631 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1999 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #59 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #40 | 1,814 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2000 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #94 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #28 | 1,792 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2001 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #72 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #43 | 1,792 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2002 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #103 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #51 | 1,760 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2003 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #39 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #27 | 1,800 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2004 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #75 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #46 | 1,731 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 2005 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #294 | 1,588 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #58 | 1,747 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #809 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #130 | 1,611 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #321 | 1,584 | 0 | 4 |