H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Sashi Menon vs Bruce Manson H2H: 0-4
Bruce Manson holds a 4–0 lead over Sashi Menon in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Bruce Manson leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Bruce Manson won the 1981 Hong Kong third round 6-0 6-7 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
IND
Age 73
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
4
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 70
Left-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 1981* | Hong Kong | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Bruce Manson | 6-0 6-7 6-3 | Sashi Menon | Match data |
| Aug 28, 1980* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Bruce Manson | 6-1 6-2 7-5 | Sashi Menon | Match data |
| Sep 28, 1977* | San Francisco | ATP 250 | R64 | Carpet | Bruce Manson | 6-1 6-4 | Sashi Menon | Match data |
| Aug 2, 1977* | North Conway | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Bruce Manson | 6-4 6-4 | Sashi Menon | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sashi Menon | #855 | #71 | 0 | 1,653 | 88 | 174 | 33.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Bruce Manson | #597 | #39 | 0 | 1,838 | 129 | 171 | 43.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sashi Menon | Bruce Manson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1970 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1971 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #274 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1972 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #187 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1973 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #215 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1974 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #188 | 1,435 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #141 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1975 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #88 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #105 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1976 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #90 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #80 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1977 | 11–27 | 28.9% | #179 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #83 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1978 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #136 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #43 | 1,803 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1979 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #187 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #75 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1980 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #123 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #98 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1981 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #123 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #135 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1982 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #388 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1983 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #147 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #463 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #493 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |