H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Sashi Menon vs Humphrey Hose H2H: 1-1
Sashi Menon and Humphrey Hose are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sashi Menon leads 1–0 on clay, while Humphrey Hose leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sashi Menon won the 1976 Cincinnati second round 3-6 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
IND
Age 73
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
VEN
Age 79
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 1976* | Cincinnati | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Sashi Menon | 3-6 7-5 6-3 | Humphrey Hose | Match data |
| Aug 22, 1974* | Columbus | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Humphrey Hose | 6-2 6-0 | Sashi Menon | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sashi Menon | #855 | #71 | 0 | 1,653 | 88 | 174 | 33.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Humphrey Hose | #340 | #125 | 0 | 1,590 | 23 | 45 | 33.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sashi Menon | Humphrey Hose | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1970 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1971 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1972 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1973 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1974 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #188 | 1,435 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1975 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #88 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1976 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #90 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1977 | 11–27 | 28.9% | #179 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1978 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #136 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1979 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #187 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #231 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1980 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #123 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #134 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1981 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #123 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #199 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1982 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #288 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1983 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #147 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #414 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #463 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #493 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |