H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Scott Davis vs Andrei Chesnokov H2H: 3-1
Scott Davis holds a 3–1 lead over Andrei Chesnokov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Scott Davis leads 3–0 on hard courts, while Andrei Chesnokov leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Scott Davis won the 1990 Cincinnati Masters third round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 63
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 60
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9, 1990* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Scott Davis | 6-3 6-2 | Andrei Chesnokov | Match data |
| Jan 14, 1990* | Auckland | ATP 250 | F | Hard | Scott Davis | 4-6 6-3 6-3 | Andrei Chesnokov | Match data |
| Mar 22, 1989* | Key Biscayne | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Scott Davis | 7-6 6-3 6-1 | Andrei Chesnokov | Match data |
| Apr 3, 1986* | Atlanta | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Andrei Chesnokov | 6-4 7-6 | Scott Davis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scott Davis | #852 | #11 | 638 | 1,923 | 206 | 197 | 51.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Andrei Chesnokov | #709 | #9 | 1,399 | 1,972 | 316 | 235 | 57.4% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Scott Davis | Andrei Chesnokov | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #480 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1980 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #457 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1981 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #457 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1982 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #273 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1983 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #24 | 1,841 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #36 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1984 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #49 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #52 | 1,802 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1985 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #17 | 1,760 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 44–16 | 73.3% | #14 | 1,884 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1986 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #39 | 1,795 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #22 | 1,863 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1987 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #59 | 1,660 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 43–20 | 68.3% | #12 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 1988 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #111 | 1,668 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #31 | 1,781 | 0 | 7 |
| 26 | 1989 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #70 | 1,720 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #30 | 1,726 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 1990 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #44 | 1,771 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #27 | 1,749 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | 1991 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #143 | 1,590 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #32 | 1,773 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | 1992 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #300 | 1,613 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #89 | 1,628 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #85 | 1,585 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #841 | 1,596 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #209 | 1,571 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #494 | 1,565 | 0 | 7 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #872 | 1,551 | 0 | 7 |