H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Scott Davis vs Andrei Chesnokov H2H: 3-1

Scott Davis holds a 3–1 lead over Andrei Chesnokov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Scott Davis leads 3–0 on hard courts, while Andrei Chesnokov leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Scott Davis won the 1990 Cincinnati Open round of 32 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Scott Davis
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Andrei Chesnokov
RUS Age 60 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Scott Davis #81 6-3 6-2 Andrei Chesnokov #13 Match data Aug 9, 1990* R32 Cincinnati Open Masters 1000 Hard
Scott Davis #52 4-6 6-3 6-3 Andrei Chesnokov #18 Match data Jan 14, 1990* F ASB Classic ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Scott Davis #101 7-6 6-3 6-1 Andrei Chesnokov #28 Match data Mar 22, 1989* R64 Miami Open ATP 500 Hard
Andrei Chesnokov #131 6-4 7-6 Scott Davis #33 Match data Apr 3, 1986* R32 Atlanta ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Scott Davis #852 #11 638 1,925 206 197 51.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Andrei Chesnokov #709 #9 1,399 1,971 317 237 57.2% 0 2 0 0 5 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Scott Davis Andrei Chesnokov
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1979 0–1 0.0% #480 1,497 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1980 0–4 0.0% #457 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1981 4–7 36.4% — 1,521 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1982 5–5 50.0% — 1,605 0 0 1985 3–3 50.0% #137 1,547 0 0
20 1983 29–16 64.4% #24 1,842 0 1 1986 13–9 59.1% #36 1,733 0 0
21 1984 23–22 51.1% #49 1,777 0 1 1987 24–16 60.0% #52 1,795 0 1
22 1985 37–21 63.8% #17 1,760 0 2 1988 44–17 72.1% #14 1,870 0 2
23 1986 19–19 50.0% #39 1,795 0 2 1989 30–16 65.2% #22 1,864 0 4
24 1987 20–21 48.8% #59 1,659 0 2 1990 43–20 68.3% #12 1,878 0 6
25 1988 12–15 44.4% #111 1,668 0 2 1991 28–21 57.1% #31 1,784 0 7
26 1989 21–18 53.8% #70 1,720 0 2 1992 29–28 50.9% #30 1,730 0 7
27 1990 24–22 52.2% #44 1,771 0 3 1993 37–28 56.9% #27 1,750 0 7
28 1991 9–22 29.0% #143 1,591 0 3 1994 37–29 56.1% #32 1,772 0 7
29 1992 3–3 50.0% #300 1,613 0 3 1995 14–22 38.9% #89 1,629 0 7
30 — — — — — — — 1996 11–20 35.5% #85 1,585 0 7
31 1994 0–1 0.0% #841 1,596 0 3 1997 2–4 33.3% #209 1,572 0 7
32 — — — — — — — 1998 2–3 40.0% #494 1,566 0 7
33 — — — — — — — 1999 0–1 0.0% #872 1,552 0 7

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Scott Davis Andrei Chesnokov
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1979 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1980 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1981 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1982 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1985 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 1983 13 8 21 61.9% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 10 5 15 66.7% 1986 5 3 8 62.5% 6 2 8 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 1984 9 8 17 52.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 11 5 16 68.8% 1 7 8 12.5% 1987 6 5 11 54.5% 16 6 22 72.7% — — — — 2 5 7 28.6%
22 1985 24 10 34 70.6% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 9 6 15 60.0% 1988 24 7 31 77.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 4 10 60.0%
23 1986 9 11 20 45.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1989 11 9 20 55.0% 17 4 21 81.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
24 1987 13 11 24 54.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 5 9 44.4% 1990 21 11 32 65.6% 21 6 27 77.8% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
25 1988 10 10 20 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1991 11 7 18 61.1% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — 7 7 14 50.0%
26 1989 16 12 28 57.1% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1992 17 13 30 56.7% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
27 1990 17 12 29 58.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1993 13 10 23 56.5% 20 10 30 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
28 1991 8 14 22 36.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1994 11 11 22 50.0% 19 13 32 59.4% — — — — 7 5 12 58.3%
29 1992 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1995 3 8 11 27.3% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 3 9 12 25.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
31 1994 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1997 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 129 107 236 54.7% 4 12 16 25.0% 30 29 59 50.8% 43 49 92 46.7% — 127 96 223 57.0% 145 80 225 64.4% 6 14 20 30.0% 39 47 86 45.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 35/38 of Scott Davis's and 277/316 of Andrei Chesnokov's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Scott Davis Andrei Chesnokov
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 42/49 2.1 2.1 62.3% 63.5% 52.4% 45.5% 53.1% 59.0% 43.2%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 50/57 3.0 3.3 54.7% 65.5% 47.0% 53.2% 42.8% 57.4% 40.2%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1993 61/65 2.9 2.6 55.6% 66.2% 50.4% 49.9% 44.3% 59.1% 42.2%
28 1991 28/31 3.2 5.0 55.7% 66.6% 49.8% 53.7% 34.4% 59.3% 35.0% 1994 57/66 2.9 2.7 58.8% 66.1% 47.6% 54.0% 47.5% 58.7% 42.1%
29 1992 6/6 3.5 8.0 58.4% 72.7% 36.5% 49.3% 32.1% 57.2% 38.0% 1995 29/36 3.3 2.8 61.0% 65.8% 49.1% 53.9% 36.0% 59.1% 38.6%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 27/31 2.7 2.9 56.8% 62.0% 45.7% 49.9% 44.7% 54.6% 40.3%
31 1994 1/1 3.0 0.0 60.7% 70.6% 63.6% 60.0% — 67.9% 21.2% 1997 6/6 3.8 2.7 56.3% 63.0% 44.3% 62.0% 63.2% 54.8% 37.9%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 4/5 1.3 3.8 59.0% 59.5% 40.9% 54.3% 49.3% 52.0% 41.3%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1999 1/1 2.0 3.0 57.4% 51.9% 50.0% 42.9% 0.0% 51.1% 27.1%
Career — 35/403 3.2 5.4 56.3% 67.8% 47.9% 53.1% 33.1% 59.2% 35.2% — 277/554 2.8 2.7 57.9% 64.9% 48.6% 51.4% 45.5% 58.1% 41.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Scott Davis Andrei Chesnokov
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1979 1497 109.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1980 1484 109.8 — — — — — — — 8.3% -2.83 — — — -0.71 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1981 1522 115.7 — — — — +53 — — 36.7% -0.90 3–3 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1982 1606 136.3 — — — — +51 — — 51.9% +0.11 1–1 3–2 (60%) — -0.04 1985 1547 121.7 — — — — — +51 — 55.0% +0.20 0–2 0–1 — +0.06
20 1983 1842 148.6 — — — — +13 -305 -271 60.9% +0.78 9–8 (53%) 11–10 (52%) — +1.09 1986 1733 139.9 — — — — -84 +19 -231 57.1% +0.44 2–2 (50%) 4–2 (67%) — -0.26
21 1984 1777 135.8 — — — — -78 -201 +5 52.6% -0.05 4–6 (40%) 7–7 (50%) — -2.22 1987 1796 145.6 — — — — -88 +23 — 57.6% +0.46 5–4 (56%) 6–3 (67%) — -0.88
22 1985 1761 150.4 — — — — +68 — -38 60.0% +0.65 9–3 (75%) 7–8 (47%) — +0.21 1988 1870 145.9 — — — — +7 +8 -313 64.4% +0.94 12–2 (86%) 9–8 (53%) — +0.32
23 1986 1796 144.8 — — — — +41 — — 49.5% -0.16 7–8 (47%) 8–7 (53%) — -0.61 1989 1864 147.5 — — — — -47 +110 — 61.3% +0.79 7–5 (58%) 6–5 (55%) — -1.29
24 1987 1659 136.0 — — — — +52 — +21 48.1% -0.16 7–6 (54%) 6–5 (55%) — -1.67 1990 1878 150.0 — — — — -51 +149 — 63.6% +0.75 12–6 (67%) 17–7 (71%) — +2.31
25 1988 1669 130.1 — — — — +42 — -18 45.7% -0.29 5–4 (56%) 3–2 (60%) — -0.82 1991 1785 146.6 -0.90 +3.53 1.055 51.0% -21 +168 — 54.8% +0.32 10–8 (56%) 3–5 (38%) — +0.62
26 1989 1721 141.0 — — — — +3 — -29 54.5% +0.22 7–5 (58%) 10–4 (71%) — -2.36 1992 1731 142.0 -2.64 +1.87 0.945 49.0% +21 +122 -215 52.0% -0.08 9–13 (41%) 16–11 (59%) — -1.43
27 1990 1771 145.5 — — — — +26 -273 -60 48.8% -0.04 14–8 (64%) 7–10 (41%) — -2.02 1993 1751 150.6 -1.34 +3.83 1.032 50.7% -18 +164 -256 53.5% +0.25 12–8 (60%) 14–6 (70%) — -1.46
28 1991 1592 127.3 -1.70 -1.91 0.862 47.6% +39 — — 33.3% -1.04 1–5 (17%) 7–7 (50%) — -0.45 1994 1773 144.3 -2.46 +3.28 1.020 50.4% -21 +36 — 54.1% +0.22 15–11 (58%) 15–6 (71%) — -0.96
29 1992 1614 106.8 -2.04 -0.01 0.889 47.2% +7 — +76 52.4% -0.05 0–1 2–3 (40%) — +0.43 1995 1629 124.4 -2.64 +0.64 0.945 48.7% +12 +110 — 44.0% -0.33 4–6 (40%) 6–9 (40%) — +0.46
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1586 127.1 -5.11 +1.56 0.888 47.6% -1 +99 — 41.0% -0.58 4–7 (36%) 3–6 (33%) — -0.37
31 1994 1596 99.5 -3.66 +0.78 0.658 45.4% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.01 1997 1573 106.6 -2.39 -0.42 0.838 46.6% -10 — — 42.9% -0.57 1–1 0–1 — +0.22
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1566 109.5 -2.05 -0.66 0.859 46.8% — +108 — 36.4% -1.45 — 1–0 — +0.01
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1553 97.0 -0.85 +0.87 0.553 38.9% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.08
Career — 1925 147.1 -1.81 -1.51 0.862 47.5% +28 -254 -37 50.4% -0.01 67–59 (53%) 72–67 (52%) 102.8 -2.29 — 1971 149.2 -2.27 +2.59 0.984 49.7% -20 +96 -265 55.4% +0.31 93–75 (55%) 100–70 (59%) 106.2 -0.47

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.