H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Scott Davis vs Bill Scanlon H2H: 1-1

Scott Davis and Bill Scanlon are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Bill Scanlon leads 1–0 on carpet, while Scott Davis leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Bill Scanlon won the 1987 Chicago quarterfinal 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Scott Davis
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Bill Scanlon
USA Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Bill Scanlon #87 6-3 6-3 Scott Davis #41 Match data Apr 4, 1987* QF Chicago ATP 250 Carpet
Scott Davis #17 6-3 6-3 Bill Scanlon #94 Match data Aug 8, 1985* R32 Stratton Mountain ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Scott Davis #852 #11 638 1,925 206 197 51.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Bill Scanlon #996 #9 56 2,018 307 259 54.2% 0 0 0 0 7 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Scott Davis Bill Scanlon
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1979 0–1 0.0% #480 1,497 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1980 0–4 0.0% #457 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1981 4–7 36.4% — 1,521 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1982 5–5 50.0% — 1,605 0 0 1976 15–17 46.9% #52 1,653 0 0
20 1983 29–16 64.4% #24 1,842 0 1 1977 36–30 54.5% #37 1,724 0 0
21 1984 23–22 51.1% #49 1,777 0 1 1978 14–21 40.0% #95 1,765 0 1
22 1985 37–21 63.8% #17 1,760 0 2 1979 27–19 58.7% #41 1,837 0 2
23 1986 19–19 50.0% #39 1,795 0 2 1980 37–29 56.1% #25 1,809 0 2
24 1987 20–21 48.8% #59 1,659 0 2 1981 39–21 65.0% #30 1,880 0 5
25 1988 12–15 44.4% #111 1,668 0 2 1982 31–24 56.4% #71 1,849 0 6
26 1989 21–18 53.8% #70 1,720 0 2 1983 42–21 66.7% #12 1,924 0 6
27 1990 24–22 52.2% #44 1,771 0 3 1984 20–17 54.1% #57 1,829 0 6
28 1991 9–22 29.0% #143 1,591 0 3 1985 7–13 35.0% #180 1,669 0 6
29 1992 3–3 50.0% #300 1,613 0 3 1986 13–13 50.0% #85 1,656 0 7
30 — — — — — — — 1987 16–17 48.5% #99 1,562 0 7
31 1994 0–1 0.0% #841 1,596 0 3 1988 6–12 33.3% #224 1,535 0 7
32 — — — — — — — 1989 4–5 44.4% #320 1,599 0 7

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Scott Davis Bill Scanlon
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1979 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1980 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1981 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1982 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1976 4 4 8 50.0% 7 8 15 46.7% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4%
20 1983 13 8 21 61.9% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 10 5 15 66.7% 1977 7 7 14 50.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 12 7 19 63.2% 10 8 18 55.6%
21 1984 9 8 17 52.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 11 5 16 68.8% 1 7 8 12.5% 1978 8 5 13 61.5% 1 7 8 12.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 8 13 38.5%
22 1985 24 10 34 70.6% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 9 6 15 60.0% 1979 10 7 17 58.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 10 7 17 58.8%
23 1986 9 11 20 45.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1980 13 8 21 61.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 14 13 27 51.9%
24 1987 13 11 24 54.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 5 9 44.4% 1981 18 8 26 69.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 17 8 25 68.0%
25 1988 10 10 20 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1982 11 8 19 57.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 16 11 27 59.3%
26 1989 16 12 28 57.1% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1983 13 6 19 68.4% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 18 8 26 69.2%
27 1990 17 12 29 58.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1984 6 4 10 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 5 8 13 38.5%
28 1991 8 14 22 36.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1985 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0%
29 1992 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1986 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 5 9 44.4%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 3 8 11 27.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 1 4 75.0%
31 1994 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1988 2 6 8 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 129 107 236 54.7% 4 12 16 25.0% 30 29 59 50.8% 43 49 92 46.7% — 107 85 192 55.7% 34 47 81 42.0% 59 41 100 59.0% 107 86 193 55.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Scott Davis Bill Scanlon
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1979 1497 109.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1980 1484 109.8 — — — — — — — 8.3% -2.83 — — — -0.71 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1981 1522 115.7 — — — — +53 — — 36.7% -0.90 3–3 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1982 1606 136.3 — — — — +51 — — 51.9% +0.11 1–1 3–2 (60%) — -0.04 1976 1654 142.6 — — — — -38 -5 — 48.0% -0.09 5–6 (45%) 4–3 (57%) — -0.46
20 1983 1842 148.6 — — — — +13 -305 -271 60.9% +0.78 9–8 (53%) 11–10 (52%) — +1.09 1977 1725 137.5 — — — — +17 -86 -47 51.5% 0.00 14–7 (67%) 10–14 (42%) — +2.62
21 1984 1777 135.8 — — — — -78 -201 +5 52.6% -0.05 4–6 (40%) 7–7 (50%) — -2.22 1978 1766 135.3 — — — — +66 -179 — 40.9% -0.83 8–7 (53%) 4–4 (50%) — -1.30
22 1985 1761 150.4 — — — — +68 — -38 60.0% +0.65 9–3 (75%) 7–8 (47%) — +0.21 1979 1838 143.2 — — — — +6 -227 -82 58.0% +0.56 4–6 (40%) 8–10 (44%) — +1.44
23 1986 1796 144.8 — — — — +41 — — 49.5% -0.16 7–8 (47%) 8–7 (53%) — -0.61 1980 1810 150.9 — — — — +21 -150 -29 52.8% +0.11 17–12 (59%) 14–14 (50%) — -5.33
24 1987 1659 136.0 — — — — +52 — +21 48.1% -0.16 7–6 (54%) 6–5 (55%) — -1.67 1981 1881 150.7 — — — — +56 — -101 60.1% +0.75 9–4 (69%) 9–4 (69%) — -0.11
25 1988 1669 130.1 — — — — +42 — -18 45.7% -0.29 5–4 (56%) 3–2 (60%) — -0.82 1982 1850 150.4 — — — — +33 -212 — 50.7% -0.13 10–9 (53%) 11–8 (58%) — -0.56
26 1989 1721 141.0 — — — — +3 — -29 54.5% +0.22 7–5 (58%) 10–4 (71%) — -2.36 1983 1925 157.4 — — — — +31 -244 -85 61.4% +0.77 13–5 (72%) 11–15 (42%) — -3.38
27 1990 1771 145.5 — — — — +26 -273 -60 48.8% -0.04 14–8 (64%) 7–10 (41%) — -2.02 1984 1830 139.9 — — — — -2 -125 +21 51.6% +0.34 6–4 (60%) 5–12 (29%) — +0.20
28 1991 1592 127.3 -1.70 -1.91 0.862 47.6% +39 — — 33.3% -1.04 1–5 (17%) 7–7 (50%) — -0.45 1985 1669 116.8 — — — — +90 — +99 39.6% -0.98 3–5 (38%) 8–5 (62%) — +0.21
29 1992 1614 106.8 -2.04 -0.01 0.889 47.2% +7 — +76 52.4% -0.05 0–1 2–3 (40%) — +0.43 1986 1657 124.4 — — — — +15 — +146 50.0% +0.23 4–5 (44%) 4–5 (44%) — +2.27
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1562 119.1 — — — — +53 — +169 42.7% -0.44 6–2 (75%) 6–11 (35%) — +2.59
31 1994 1596 99.5 -3.66 +0.78 0.658 45.4% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.01 1988 1535 117.2 — — — — +7 — +156 40.0% -0.86 3–6 (33%) 5–3 (63%) — -0.45
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1600 129.3 — — — — +18 — — 44.0% -0.08 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — -1.52
Career — 1925 147.1 -1.81 -1.51 0.862 47.5% +28 -254 -37 50.4% -0.01 67–59 (53%) 72–67 (52%) 102.8 -2.29 — 2018 148.5 — — — — +28 -134 +24 51.7% +0.09 103–80 (56%) 99–110 (47%) 102.8 -0.67

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.