H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Scott Davis vs David Pate H2H: 1-1

Scott Davis and David Pate are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Scott Davis leads 1–0 on carpet, while David Pate leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, David Pate won the 1987 Japan Open semifinal 7-5 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Scott Davis
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
David Pate
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
David Pate #42 7-5 6-1 Scott Davis #35 Match data Apr 18, 1987* SF Japan Open ATP 250 Hard
Scott Davis #13 1-6 6-4 6-3 David Pate #25 Match data Apr 26, 1985* R16 Atlanta ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Scott Davis #852 #11 638 1,925 206 197 51.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3
David Pate #911 #18 441 1,875 181 168 51.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Scott Davis David Pate
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1979 0–1 0.0% #480 1,497 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1980 0–4 0.0% #457 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1981 4–7 36.4% — 1,521 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1982 5–5 50.0% — 1,605 0 0 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,493 0 0
20 1983 29–16 64.4% #24 1,842 0 1 1982 2–5 28.6% — 1,484 0 0
21 1984 23–22 51.1% #49 1,777 0 1 1983 5–7 41.7% #203 1,529 0 0
22 1985 37–21 63.8% #17 1,760 0 2 1984 21–13 61.8% #30 1,743 0 1
23 1986 19–19 50.0% #39 1,795 0 2 1985 31–24 56.4% #26 1,742 0 1
24 1987 20–21 48.8% #59 1,659 0 2 1986 35–23 60.3% #30 1,788 0 1
25 1988 12–15 44.4% #111 1,668 0 2 1987 28–18 60.9% #18 1,750 0 2
26 1989 21–18 53.8% #70 1,720 0 2 1988 20–16 55.6% #47 1,715 0 2
27 1990 24–22 52.2% #44 1,771 0 3 1989 9–19 32.1% #157 1,656 0 2
28 1991 9–22 29.0% #143 1,591 0 3 1990 16–15 51.6% #94 1,657 0 2
29 1992 3–3 50.0% #300 1,613 0 3 1991 11–18 37.9% #160 1,596 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 1992 1–4 20.0% #396 1,573 0 2
31 1994 0–1 0.0% #841 1,596 0 3 1993 1–3 25.0% #514 1,548 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 1994 1–1 50.0% #624 1,561 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 1995 0–1 0.0% #911 1,542 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Scott Davis David Pate
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1979 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1980 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1981 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1982 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1981 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1983 13 8 21 61.9% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 10 5 15 66.7% 1982 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
21 1984 9 8 17 52.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 11 5 16 68.8% 1 7 8 12.5% 1983 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
22 1985 24 10 34 70.6% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 9 6 15 60.0% 1984 18 6 24 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1986 9 11 20 45.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1985 15 11 26 57.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 7 8 15 46.7%
24 1987 13 11 24 54.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 5 9 44.4% 1986 20 11 31 64.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 8 19 57.9%
25 1988 10 10 20 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1987 18 10 28 64.3% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% 5 5 10 50.0%
26 1989 16 12 28 57.1% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1988 16 11 27 59.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
27 1990 17 12 29 58.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1989 6 14 20 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
28 1991 8 14 22 36.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1990 7 10 17 41.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0%
29 1992 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1991 6 10 16 37.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 1994 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 129 107 236 54.7% 4 12 16 25.0% 30 29 59 50.8% 43 49 92 46.7% — 113 98 211 53.6% 5 13 18 27.8% 31 26 57 54.4% 32 31 63 50.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Scott Davis David Pate
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1979 1497 109.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1980 1484 109.8 — — — — — — — 8.3% -2.83 — — — -0.71 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1981 1522 115.7 — — — — +53 — — 36.7% -0.90 3–3 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1982 1606 136.3 — — — — +51 — — 51.9% +0.11 1–1 3–2 (60%) — -0.04 1981 1494 104.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.00 — 0–2 — -0.08
20 1983 1842 148.6 — — — — +13 -305 -271 60.9% +0.78 9–8 (53%) 11–10 (52%) — +1.09 1982 1485 108.5 — — — — +40 — — 31.6% -1.00 1–0 1–0 — +0.29
21 1984 1777 135.8 — — — — -78 -201 +5 52.6% -0.05 4–6 (40%) 7–7 (50%) — -2.22 1983 1529 119.4 — — — — +10 — +62 37.9% -0.24 2–1 (67%) 2–8 (20%) — +0.28
22 1985 1761 150.4 — — — — +68 — -38 60.0% +0.65 9–3 (75%) 7–8 (47%) — +0.21 1984 1744 140.4 — — — — +36 -218 -186 59.5% +0.43 3–5 (38%) 4–4 (50%) — +0.33
23 1986 1796 144.8 — — — — +41 — — 49.5% -0.16 7–8 (47%) 8–7 (53%) — -0.61 1985 1743 138.8 — — — — +29 -206 -84 52.4% +0.13 17–9 (65%) 15–13 (54%) — +0.85
24 1987 1659 136.0 — — — — +52 — +21 48.1% -0.16 7–6 (54%) 6–5 (55%) — -1.67 1986 1788 146.3 — — — — +34 — -115 58.3% +0.59 8–7 (53%) 9–9 (50%) — +0.85
25 1988 1669 130.1 — — — — +42 — -18 45.7% -0.29 5–4 (56%) 3–2 (60%) — -0.82 1987 1751 141.1 — — — — +30 — -55 61.5% +0.54 6–11 (35%) 18–11 (62%) — -0.04
26 1989 1721 141.0 — — — — +3 — -29 54.5% +0.22 7–5 (58%) 10–4 (71%) — -2.36 1988 1716 139.3 — — — — +41 — -25 52.7% +0.32 7–5 (58%) 7–11 (39%) — -1.56
27 1990 1771 145.5 — — — — +26 -273 -60 48.8% -0.04 14–8 (64%) 7–10 (41%) — -2.02 1989 1656 135.9 — — — — +19 — +63 35.5% -1.12 5–5 (50%) 5–8 (38%) — -2.42
28 1991 1592 127.3 -1.70 -1.91 0.862 47.6% +39 — — 33.3% -1.04 1–5 (17%) 7–7 (50%) — -0.45 1990 1658 127.8 — — — — -22 — +129 50.6% +0.33 6–5 (55%) 7–8 (47%) — +0.85
29 1992 1614 106.8 -2.04 -0.01 0.889 47.2% +7 — +76 52.4% -0.05 0–1 2–3 (40%) — +0.43 1991 1596 133.2 — — — — +31 -112 +179 40.3% -0.61 5–6 (45%) 3–7 (30%) — -0.86
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1574 104.4 — — — — +24 — — 28.6% -1.57 1–1 2–1 (67%) — -0.43
31 1994 1596 99.5 -3.66 +0.78 0.658 45.4% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.01 1993 1548 104.3 — — — — +35 — — 33.3% -0.78 0–1 0–2 — +0.22
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1561 100.6 — — — — — — — 40.0% -2.20 1–0 — — -0.12
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1542 99.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.14
Career — 1925 147.1 -1.81 -1.51 0.862 47.5% +28 -254 -37 50.4% -0.01 67–59 (53%) 72–67 (52%) 102.8 -2.29 — 1875 143.1 — — — — +27 -183 -21 50.8% +0.06 62–57 (52%) 73–84 (46%) 98.7 -0.49

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.