H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Scott Davis vs Francisco Gonzalez H2H: 3-0

Scott Davis holds a 3–0 lead over Francisco Gonzalez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Scott Davis leads 2–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Scott Davis won the 1985 Newport round of 16 7-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Scott Davis
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Francisco Gonzalez
PAR Age 70 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Scott Davis #20 7-6 6-1 Francisco Gonzalez #73 Match data Jul 12, 1985* R16 Newport ATP 250 Grass
Scott Davis #58 6-4 6-4 6-4 Francisco Gonzalez #93 Match data Dec 2, 1984* R32 Australian Open Grand Slam Grass
Scott Davis #82 6-3 6-0 Francisco Gonzalez #91 Match data Aug 4, 1983* R32 Columbus ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Scott Davis #852 #11 638 1,925 206 197 51.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Francisco Gonzalez #997 #40 0 1,758 105 157 40.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Scott Davis Francisco Gonzalez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1979 0–1 0.0% #480 1,497 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1980 0–4 0.0% #457 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1981 4–7 36.4% — 1,521 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1982 5–5 50.0% — 1,605 0 0 1975 0–2 0.0% #308 1,486 0 0
20 1983 29–16 64.4% #24 1,842 0 1 1976 0–3 0.0% #272 1,455 0 0
21 1984 23–22 51.1% #49 1,777 0 1 1977 4–6 40.0% #281 1,499 0 0
22 1985 37–21 63.8% #17 1,760 0 2 1978 8–10 44.4% #61 1,602 0 0
23 1986 19–19 50.0% #39 1,795 0 2 1979 21–26 44.7% #77 1,649 0 0
24 1987 20–21 48.8% #59 1,659 0 2 1980 12–20 37.5% #74 1,704 0 0
25 1988 12–15 44.4% #111 1,668 0 2 1981 12–15 44.4% #98 1,659 0 0
26 1989 21–18 53.8% #70 1,720 0 2 1982 14–19 42.4% #100 1,685 0 0
27 1990 24–22 52.2% #44 1,771 0 3 1983 11–16 40.7% #99 1,623 0 0
28 1991 9–22 29.0% #143 1,591 0 3 1984 14–17 45.2% #82 1,654 0 0
29 1992 3–3 50.0% #300 1,613 0 3 1985 9–17 34.6% #140 1,533 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 1986 0–6 0.0% #548 1,470 0 0
31 1994 0–1 0.0% #841 1,596 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Scott Davis Francisco Gonzalez
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1979 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1980 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1981 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1982 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1975 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1983 13 8 21 61.9% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 10 5 15 66.7% 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1984 9 8 17 52.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 11 5 16 68.8% 1 7 8 12.5% 1977 2 2 4 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — —
22 1985 24 10 34 70.6% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 9 6 15 60.0% 1978 0 3 3 0.0% 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — — — — —
23 1986 9 11 20 45.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1979 10 10 20 50.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
24 1987 13 11 24 54.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 5 9 44.4% 1980 11 9 20 55.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
25 1988 10 10 20 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1981 5 6 11 45.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 1989 16 12 28 57.1% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1982 2 4 6 33.3% 5 7 12 41.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
27 1990 17 12 29 58.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1983 9 10 19 47.4% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0%
28 1991 8 14 22 36.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1984 5 7 12 41.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1%
29 1992 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1985 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 4 7 11 36.4% 5 6 11 45.5%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
31 1994 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 129 107 236 54.7% 4 12 16 25.0% 30 29 59 50.8% 43 49 92 46.7% — 44 62 106 41.5% 26 43 69 37.7% 16 24 40 40.0% 19 28 47 40.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Scott Davis Francisco Gonzalez
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1979 1497 109.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1980 1484 109.8 — — — — — — — 8.3% -2.83 — — — -0.71 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1981 1522 115.7 — — — — +53 — — 36.7% -0.90 3–3 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1982 1606 136.3 — — — — +51 — — 51.9% +0.11 1–1 3–2 (60%) — -0.04 1975 1487 102.1 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.40 0–1 0–2 — -0.09
20 1983 1842 148.6 — — — — +13 -305 -271 60.9% +0.78 9–8 (53%) 11–10 (52%) — +1.09 1976 1455 101.2 — — — — — — — 25.0% -1.88 0–2 0–1 — +0.16
21 1984 1777 135.8 — — — — -78 -201 +5 52.6% -0.05 4–6 (40%) 7–7 (50%) — -2.22 1977 1500 113.8 — — — — +54 +17 — 39.1% -1.61 2–1 (67%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.31
22 1985 1761 150.4 — — — — +68 — -38 60.0% +0.65 9–3 (75%) 7–8 (47%) — +0.21 1978 1602 128.6 — — — — -59 +21 — 41.0% -0.90 3–2 (60%) 4–1 (80%) — -1.22
23 1986 1796 144.8 — — — — +41 — — 49.5% -0.16 7–8 (47%) 8–7 (53%) — -0.61 1979 1650 132.9 — — — — +20 -50 -143 44.3% -0.28 7–6 (54%) 6–10 (38%) — +0.49
24 1987 1659 136.0 — — — — +52 — +21 48.1% -0.16 7–6 (54%) 6–5 (55%) — -1.67 1980 1704 136.2 — — — — +18 -124 -228 40.5% -0.65 4–4 (50%) 7–7 (50%) — -2.51
25 1988 1669 130.1 — — — — +42 — -18 45.7% -0.29 5–4 (56%) 3–2 (60%) — -0.82 1981 1659 126.6 — — — — +2 -100 -75 48.6% -0.11 2–4 (33%) 5–2 (71%) — +0.46
26 1989 1721 141.0 — — — — +3 — -29 54.5% +0.22 7–5 (58%) 10–4 (71%) — -2.36 1982 1686 129.7 — — — — -33 -103 -85 46.4% -0.12 3–7 (30%) 11–12 (48%) — +0.29
27 1990 1771 145.5 — — — — +26 -273 -60 48.8% -0.04 14–8 (64%) 7–10 (41%) — -2.02 1983 1624 126.5 — — — — +5 -83 — 37.7% -0.84 4–0 (100%) 6–7 (46%) — +0.17
28 1991 1592 127.3 -1.70 -1.91 0.862 47.6% +39 — — 33.3% -1.04 1–5 (17%) 7–7 (50%) — -0.45 1984 1655 132.0 — — — — -20 -90 +1 46.9% -0.02 4–6 (40%) 5–6 (45%) — +1.36
29 1992 1614 106.8 -2.04 -0.01 0.889 47.2% +7 — +76 52.4% -0.05 0–1 2–3 (40%) — +0.43 1985 1533 120.3 — — — — +42 — +57 39.1% -0.35 5–5 (50%) 5–7 (42%) — +1.77
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1470 107.8 — — — — +29 — — 13.3% -2.07 0–2 1–3 (25%) — +0.28
31 1994 1596 99.5 -3.66 +0.78 0.658 45.4% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1925 147.1 -1.81 -1.51 0.862 47.5% +28 -254 -37 50.4% -0.01 67–59 (53%) 72–67 (52%) 102.8 -2.29 — 1759 134.8 — — — — +8 -53 -47 42.2% -0.47 34–40 (46%) 53–60 (47%) 102.8 +0.56

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.