H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Scott Davis vs Jakob Hlasek H2H: 1-2
Jakob Hlasek holds a 2–1 lead over Scott Davis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jakob Hlasek leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Jakob Hlasek won the 1990 Canada Masters second round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 63
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 61
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 1990* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Jakob Hlasek | 6-3 6-2 | Scott Davis | Match data |
| Sep 3, 1987* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Jakob Hlasek | 3-6 6-3 2-6 6-4 6-4 | Scott Davis | Match data |
| Feb 5, 1985* | Delray Beach | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Scott Davis | 6-1 6-2 | Jakob Hlasek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scott Davis | #852 | #11 | 638 | 1,923 | 206 | 197 | 51.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Jakob Hlasek | #583 | #7 | 1,308 | 2,062 | 389 | 300 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Scott Davis | Jakob Hlasek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #480 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1980 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #457 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1981 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #457 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #227 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1982 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #273 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #91 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1983 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #24 | 1,841 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #33 | 1,784 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1984 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #49 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #32 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1985 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #17 | 1,760 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #23 | 1,856 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1986 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #39 | 1,795 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 44–14 | 75.9% | #8 | 2,050 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1987 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #59 | 1,660 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,795 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1988 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #111 | 1,668 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #17 | 1,937 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1989 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #70 | 1,720 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 45–25 | 64.3% | #20 | 1,869 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1990 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #44 | 1,771 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #36 | 1,806 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1991 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #143 | 1,590 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #71 | 1,713 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 1992 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #300 | 1,613 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #70 | 1,676 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #35 | 1,783 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #841 | 1,596 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #74 | 1,751 | 0 | 5 |