H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Scott Davis vs Jim Grabb H2H: 3-0
Scott Davis holds a 3–0 lead over Jim Grabb in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Scott Davis leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Scott Davis won the 1991 Indian Wells Masters fourth round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 63
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 1991* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Scott Davis | 6-4 6-4 | Jim Grabb | Match data |
| Oct 4, 1990* | Sydney Indoor | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Scott Davis | 3-6 6-3 6-3 | Jim Grabb | Match data |
| Jun 8, 1988* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | R64 | Grass | Scott Davis | 6-4 5-7 6-2 | Jim Grabb | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scott Davis | #852 | #11 | 638 | 1,923 | 206 | 197 | 51.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Jim Grabb | #927 | #24 | 760 | 1,828 | 179 | 199 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Scott Davis | Jim Grabb | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #480 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1980 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #457 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1981 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #457 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1982 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #273 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1983 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #24 | 1,841 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1984 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #49 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #251 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1985 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #17 | 1,760 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #94 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1986 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #39 | 1,795 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #66 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1987 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #59 | 1,660 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #91 | 1,562 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1988 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #111 | 1,668 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #35 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1989 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #70 | 1,720 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #72 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1990 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #44 | 1,771 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #87 | 1,679 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1991 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #143 | 1,590 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #55 | 1,747 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1992 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #300 | 1,613 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #197 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #68 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #841 | 1,596 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #207 | 1,544 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #199 | 1,565 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #342 | 1,516 | 0 | 2 |