H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Scott Davis vs Jimmy Connors H2H: 3-1

Scott Davis holds a 3–1 lead over Jimmy Connors in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Scott Davis leads 2–1 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Scott Davis won the 1987 Japan Open quarterfinal 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Scott Davis
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Jimmy Connors
USA Age 74 Left-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Scott Davis #35 6-3 6-4 Jimmy Connors #9 Match data Apr 18, 1987* QF Japan Open ATP 250 Hard
Jimmy Connors #8 6-3 4-6 7-5 Scott Davis #38 Match data Feb 6, 1987* R16 Philadelphia ATP 250 Carpet
Scott Davis #61 6-2 6-2 Jimmy Connors #7 Match data Nov 22, 1986* QF Houston ATP 250 Carpet
Scott Davis #39 6-3 6-4 Jimmy Connors #3 Match data Oct 29, 1983* SF Tokyo Indoor ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Scott Davis #852 #11 638 1,925 206 197 51.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Jimmy Connors #1,295 #1 875 2,441 1,266 298 80.9% 8 0 1 0 100 109

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Scott Davis Jimmy Connors
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1979 0–1 0.0% #480 1,497 0 0 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,480 0 0
17 1980 0–4 0.0% #457 1,484 0 0 1970 5–4 55.6% — 1,557 0 0
18 1981 4–7 36.4% — 1,521 0 0 1971 23–13 63.9% — 1,773 0 0
19 1982 5–5 50.0% — 1,605 0 0 1972 76–25 75.2% — 1,995 0 6
20 1983 29–16 64.4% #24 1,842 0 1 1973 86–16 84.3% #3 2,156 0 17
21 1984 23–22 51.1% #49 1,777 0 1 1974 95–6 94.1% #1 2,327 3 32
22 1985 37–21 63.8% #17 1,760 0 2 1975 79–10 88.8% #1 2,299 3 41
23 1986 19–19 50.0% #39 1,795 0 2 1976 98–9 91.6% #1 2,386 4 53
24 1987 20–21 48.8% #59 1,659 0 2 1977 70–16 81.4% #1 2,342 4 61
25 1988 12–15 44.4% #111 1,668 0 2 1978 68–7 90.7% #1 2,385 5 71
26 1989 21–18 53.8% #70 1,720 0 2 1979 79–13 85.9% #2 2,309 5 79
27 1990 24–22 52.2% #44 1,771 0 3 1980 73–15 83.0% #3 2,208 5 85
28 1991 9–22 29.0% #143 1,591 0 3 1981 59–12 83.1% #2 2,169 5 89
29 1992 3–3 50.0% #300 1,613 0 3 1982 78–11 87.6% #2 2,282 7 96
30 — — — — — — — 1983 52–11 82.5% #3 2,200 8 100
31 1994 0–1 0.0% #841 1,596 0 3 1984 69–12 85.2% #2 2,242 8 105
32 — — — — — — — 1985 45–15 75.0% #4 2,155 8 105
33 — — — — — — — 1986 46–15 75.4% #8 2,015 8 105
34 — — — — — — — 1987 52–19 73.2% #4 1,987 8 105
35 — — — — — — — 1988 40–11 78.4% #7 2,036 8 107
36 — — — — — — — 1989 31–13 70.5% #14 1,962 8 109
37 — — — — — — — 1990 0–3 0.0% #936 1,885 8 109
38 — — — — — — — 1991 19–14 57.6% #49 1,889 8 109
39 — — — — — — — 1992 17–16 51.5% #84 1,784 8 109
40 — — — — — — — 1993 3–5 37.5% #370 1,724 8 109
41 — — — — — — — 1994 1–3 25.0% #672 1,687 8 109
42 — — — — — — — 1995 2–2 50.0% #419 1,678 8 109
43 — — — — — — — 1996 0–1 0.0% #1300 1,669 8 109

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Scott Davis Jimmy Connors
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1979 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1969 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
17 1980 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1970 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
18 1981 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1971 19 7 26 73.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
19 1982 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1972 25 8 33 75.8% 18 7 25 72.0% 10 3 13 76.9% 23 7 30 76.7%
20 1983 13 8 21 61.9% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 10 5 15 66.7% 1973 46 3 49 93.9% 12 5 17 70.6% 13 4 17 76.5% 15 4 19 78.9%
21 1984 9 8 17 52.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 11 5 16 68.8% 1 7 8 12.5% 1974 20 1 21 95.2% 9 2 11 81.8% 29 1 30 96.7% 37 2 39 94.9%
22 1985 24 10 34 70.6% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 9 6 15 60.0% 1975 15 1 16 93.8% 22 2 24 91.7% 14 3 17 82.4% 28 4 32 87.5%
23 1986 9 11 20 45.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1976 20 3 23 87.0% 29 3 32 90.6% 9 1 10 90.0% 40 2 42 95.2%
24 1987 13 11 24 54.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 5 9 44.4% 1977 16 2 18 88.9% 18 5 23 78.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 29 7 36 80.6%
25 1988 10 10 20 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1978 18 1 19 94.7% 13 1 14 92.9% 12 1 13 92.3% 25 4 29 86.2%
26 1989 16 12 28 57.1% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1979 33 3 36 91.7% 13 3 16 81.3% 5 1 6 83.3% 28 6 34 82.4%
27 1990 17 12 29 58.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1980 17 3 20 85.0% 18 6 24 75.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 33 5 38 86.8%
28 1991 8 14 22 36.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1981 22 4 26 84.6% 15 3 18 83.3% 5 1 6 83.3% 17 4 21 81.0%
29 1992 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1982 36 4 40 90.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 13 0 13 100.0% 22 5 27 81.5%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 25 5 30 83.3% 4 1 5 80.0% 9 1 10 90.0% 14 4 18 77.8%
31 1994 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 30 4 34 88.2% 8 2 10 80.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 21 4 25 84.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 18 6 24 75.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 14 5 19 73.7%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 25 7 32 78.1% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% 16 6 22 72.7%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 33 10 43 76.7% 4 1 5 80.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 5 6 11 45.5%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 29 7 36 80.6% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% 6 2 8 75.0%
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 25 6 31 80.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 13 7 20 65.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 4 6 33.3%
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 15 11 26 57.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 129 107 236 54.7% 4 12 16 25.0% 30 29 59 50.8% 43 49 92 46.7% — 506 112 618 81.9% 210 61 271 77.5% 174 38 212 82.1% 376 87 463 81.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Scott Davis Jimmy Connors
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1979 1497 109.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — -0.09 1969 1480 97.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 — — +0.19
17 1980 1484 109.8 — — — — — — — 8.3% -2.83 — — — -0.71 1970 1558 114.8 — — — — +95 — -49 50.0% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.24
18 1981 1522 115.7 — — — — +53 — — 36.7% -0.90 3–3 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.01 1971 1773 125.8 — — — — +97 -248 — 59.6% +0.63 9–5 (64%) 7–9 (44%) — +2.95
19 1982 1606 136.3 — — — — +51 — — 51.9% +0.11 1–1 3–2 (60%) — -0.04 1972 1996 147.3 — — — — +64 -226 -238 69.4% +1.26 18–15 (55%) 14–11 (56%) — +3.34
20 1983 1842 148.6 — — — — +13 -305 -271 60.9% +0.78 9–8 (53%) 11–10 (52%) — +1.09 1973 2156 156.4 — — — — +95 -299 -234 78.6% +2.04 14–9 (61%) 13–11 (54%) — 0.00
21 1984 1777 135.8 — — — — -78 -201 +5 52.6% -0.05 4–6 (40%) 7–7 (50%) — -2.22 1974 2327 156.3 — — — — +66 -370 -5 85.9% +2.48 15–3 (83%) 15–8 (65%) — +2.36
22 1985 1761 150.4 — — — — +68 — -38 60.0% +0.65 9–3 (75%) 7–8 (47%) — +0.21 1975 2299 164.9 — — — — +130 -149 -31 84.5% +2.56 12–2 (86%) 8–3 (73%) — -0.69
23 1986 1796 144.8 — — — — +41 — — 49.5% -0.16 7–8 (47%) 8–7 (53%) — -0.61 1976 2386 175.3 — — — — +105 -35 -92 87.1% +2.45 13–4 (76%) 20–6 (77%) — -2.86
24 1987 1659 136.0 — — — — +52 — +21 48.1% -0.16 7–6 (54%) 6–5 (55%) — -1.67 1977 2343 176.2 — — — — +110 -49 -30 79.1% +2.09 12–5 (71%) 4–4 (50%) — -3.18
25 1988 1669 130.1 — — — — +42 — -18 45.7% -0.29 5–4 (56%) 3–2 (60%) — -0.82 1978 2385 171.9 — — — — +38 -56 -52 86.1% +2.37 10–3 (77%) 7–3 (70%) — -2.85
26 1989 1721 141.0 — — — — +3 — -29 54.5% +0.22 7–5 (58%) 10–4 (71%) — -2.36 1979 2310 177.1 — — — — +78 +55 +47 77.6% +1.93 16–3 (84%) 12–8 (60%) — -4.08
27 1990 1771 145.5 — — — — +26 -273 -60 48.8% -0.04 14–8 (64%) 7–10 (41%) — -2.02 1980 2209 172.6 — — — — +167 -11 +152 78.2% +2.18 11–6 (65%) 16–12 (57%) — -2.66
28 1991 1592 127.3 -1.70 -1.91 0.862 47.6% +39 — — 33.3% -1.04 1–5 (17%) 7–7 (50%) — -0.45 1981 2170 172.7 — — — — +131 +7 +149 76.1% +1.96 11–4 (73%) 10–8 (56%) — -3.29
29 1992 1614 106.8 -2.04 -0.01 0.889 47.2% +7 — +76 52.4% -0.05 0–1 2–3 (40%) — +0.43 1982 2282 171.6 — — — — +42 -144 +139 81.8% +2.33 11–2 (85%) 15–5 (75%) — -4.60
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 2200 169.8 — — — — +74 -86 +260 78.1% +2.05 6–2 (75%) 10–3 (77%) — -3.68
31 1994 1596 99.5 -3.66 +0.78 0.658 45.4% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.01 1984 2243 172.5 — — — — +36 -114 +203 77.6% +1.88 14–6 (70%) 14–7 (67%) — -6.13
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 2155 161.7 — — — — +58 -25 +241 74.1% +1.48 6–3 (67%) 8–3 (73%) — -3.15
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 2015 156.9 — — — — +63 — +293 68.8% +1.35 15–5 (75%) 10–9 (53%) — -2.10
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1987 161.0 — — — — +39 +104 +276 67.2% +1.33 12–3 (80%) 10–11 (48%) — -1.55
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 2036 157.7 — — — — +53 — +97 76.9% +1.99 6–5 (55%) 6–8 (43%) — -0.10
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1963 149.7 — — — — +100 +14 — 66.4% +1.25 6–4 (60%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.14
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1886 104.1 — — — — +80 — — 14.3% -1.43 0–1 0–2 — -0.13
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1889 146.4 -1.80 +3.12 1.005 50.1% +29 +62 +178 57.1% +0.30 7–5 (58%) 7–4 (64%) — -2.82
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1785 141.4 -1.86 +2.27 0.962 49.5% +35 +121 — 51.8% +0.05 8–6 (57%) 6–4 (60%) — -2.16
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1724 107.2 -2.74 +0.29 0.890 47.1% +57 — — 37.5% -0.69 2–0 0–2 — -0.14
41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1687 107.8 -2.12 +0.37 0.980 49.9% — — — 40.0% -0.30 0–2 0–1 — +0.01
42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1678 102.2 -1.10 +0.01 0.912 49.1% — — +305 50.0% +0.25 — 2–1 (67%) — +0.27
43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1669 100.0 +0.85 +1.29 0.725 44.1% — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 — — -0.32
Career — 1925 147.1 -1.81 -1.51 0.862 47.5% +28 -254 -37 50.4% -0.01 67–59 (53%) 72–67 (52%) 102.8 -2.29 — 2442 169.4 -1.84 +2.23 0.967 49.5% +78 -89 +40 75.9% +1.82 236–106 (69%) 218–151 (59%) 99.9 -2.45

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.