H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 14:15 UTC
Scott Davis vs M. Ostoja H2H: 0-1
M. Ostoja holds a 1–0 lead over Scott Davis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, M. Ostoja leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, M. Ostoja won the 1984 Rotterdam third round 6-3 3-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 63
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 65
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 1984* | Rotterdam | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | M. Ostoja | 6-3 3-6 6-1 | Scott Davis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scott Davis | #852 | #11 | 638 | 1,923 | 206 | 197 | 51.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| M. Ostoja | #1,220 | #74 | 92 | 1,711 | 77 | 136 | 36.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Scott Davis | M. Ostoja | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #480 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1980 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #457 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1981 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #457 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #377 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1982 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #273 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #203 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1983 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #24 | 1,841 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #203 | 1,591 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1984 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #49 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #172 | 1,583 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1985 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #17 | 1,760 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #95 | 1,586 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1986 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #39 | 1,795 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #125 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1987 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #59 | 1,660 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #166 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1988 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #111 | 1,668 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #136 | 1,544 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1989 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #70 | 1,720 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #467 | 1,482 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1990 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #44 | 1,771 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #199 | 1,512 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1991 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #143 | 1,590 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #224 | 1,511 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1992 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #300 | 1,613 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #624 | 1,494 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #841 | 1,596 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |