H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Scott Davis vs Mark Edmondson H2H: 1-1
Scott Davis and Mark Edmondson are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Scott Davis leads 1–0 on clay, while Mark Edmondson leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Scott Davis won the 1984 Monte Carlo third round 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 63
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 72
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 1984* | Monte Carlo | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Scott Davis | 7-5 6-1 | Mark Edmondson | Match data |
| Apr 16, 1981* | Los Angeles | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Mark Edmondson | 6-3 2-6 6-4 | Scott Davis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scott Davis | #852 | #11 | 638 | 1,923 | 206 | 197 | 51.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Mark Edmondson | #525 | #15 | 0 | 1,927 | 244 | 231 | 51.4% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Scott Davis | Mark Edmondson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #480 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1980 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #457 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1981 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #457 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1982 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #273 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1983 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #24 | 1,841 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1984 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #49 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #212 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1985 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #17 | 1,760 | 0 | 2 | 1976 | 42–29 | 59.2% | #35 | 1,754 | 1 | 2 |
| 23 | 1986 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #39 | 1,795 | 0 | 2 | 1977 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #99 | 1,598 | 1 | 2 |
| 24 | 1987 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #59 | 1,660 | 0 | 2 | 1978 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #79 | 1,682 | 1 | 3 |
| 25 | 1988 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #111 | 1,668 | 0 | 2 | 1979 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #95 | 1,740 | 1 | 3 |
| 26 | 1989 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #70 | 1,720 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #91 | 1,714 | 1 | 3 |
| 27 | 1990 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #44 | 1,771 | 0 | 3 | 1981 | 59–26 | 69.4% | #23 | 1,902 | 1 | 6 |
| 28 | 1991 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #143 | 1,590 | 0 | 3 | 1982 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #18 | 1,713 | 1 | 6 |
| 29 | 1992 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #300 | 1,613 | 0 | 3 | 1983 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #37 | 1,687 | 1 | 6 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #145 | 1,572 | 1 | 6 |
| 31 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #841 | 1,596 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #115 | 1,595 | 1 | 6 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #307 | 1,540 | 1 | 6 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #523 | 1,550 | 1 | 6 |