H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Scott Davis vs Mel Purcell H2H: 1-0
Scott Davis holds a 1–0 lead over Mel Purcell in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Scott Davis leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Scott Davis won the 1985 Fort Myers fourth round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 63
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 67
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 1985* | Fort Myers | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Scott Davis | 6-2 6-1 | Mel Purcell | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scott Davis | #852 | #11 | 638 | 1,923 | 206 | 197 | 51.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Mel Purcell | #673 | #21 | 21 | 1,991 | 190 | 164 | 53.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Scott Davis | Mel Purcell | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #480 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1980 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #457 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1981 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #457 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1982 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #273 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #245 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1983 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #24 | 1,841 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #27 | 1,742 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1984 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #49 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 48–20 | 70.6% | #24 | 1,914 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1985 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #17 | 1,760 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 38–24 | 61.3% | #28 | 1,837 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1986 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #39 | 1,795 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #28 | 1,770 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1987 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #59 | 1,660 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #67 | 1,702 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1988 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #111 | 1,668 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #129 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1989 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #70 | 1,720 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #72 | 1,649 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1990 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #44 | 1,771 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #140 | 1,529 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1991 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #143 | 1,590 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #268 | 1,537 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1992 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #300 | 1,613 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #504 | 1,525 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #841 | 1,596 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |