H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC
Scott Davis vs Paul Annacone H2H: 2-1
Scott Davis holds a 2–1 lead over Paul Annacone in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Scott Davis leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Scott Davis won the 1986 Hong Kong fourth round 6-4 4-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 63
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 63
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 1986* | Hong Kong | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Scott Davis | 6-4 4-6 6-2 | Paul Annacone | Match data |
| Sep 21, 1985* | Los Angeles | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Paul Annacone | 6-4 6-2 | Scott Davis | Match data |
| Feb 7, 1985* | Delray Beach | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Scott Davis | 7-5 6-4 | Paul Annacone | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scott Davis | #852 | #11 | 638 | 1,923 | 206 | 197 | 51.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Paul Annacone | #1,209 | #12 | 430 | 1,966 | 160 | 131 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Scott Davis | Paul Annacone | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #480 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1980 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #457 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1981 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #457 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1982 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #273 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1983 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #24 | 1,841 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #389 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1984 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #49 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #94 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1985 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #17 | 1,760 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 45–19 | 70.3% | #13 | 1,903 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1986 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #39 | 1,795 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #43 | 1,787 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1987 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #59 | 1,660 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #32 | 1,824 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1988 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #111 | 1,668 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #38 | 1,787 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1989 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #70 | 1,720 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,732 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1990 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #44 | 1,771 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #165 | 1,650 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1991 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #143 | 1,590 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #433 | 1,630 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1992 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #300 | 1,613 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #225 | 1,588 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #813 | 1,576 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #841 | 1,596 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |