H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Scott Davis vs Paul Annacone H2H: 2-1

Scott Davis holds a 2–1 lead over Paul Annacone in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Scott Davis leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Scott Davis won the 1986 Hong Kong Open round of 16 6-4 4-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Scott Davis
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Paul Annacone
USA Age 63 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Scott Davis #89 6-4 4-6 6-2 Paul Annacone #38 Match data Oct 31, 1986* R16 Hong Kong Open ATP 250 Hard
Paul Annacone #27 6-4 6-2 Scott Davis #16 Match data Sep 21, 1985* QF Los Angeles Open ATP 250 Hard
Scott Davis #27 7-5 6-4 Paul Annacone #94 Match data Feb 7, 1985* R32 Miami Open ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Scott Davis #852 #11 638 1,925 206 197 51.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Paul Annacone #1,209 #12 430 1,942 160 131 55.0% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Scott Davis Paul Annacone
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1979 0–1 0.0% #480 1,497 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1980 0–4 0.0% #457 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1981 4–7 36.4% — 1,521 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1982 5–5 50.0% — 1,605 0 0 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 0
20 1983 29–16 64.4% #24 1,842 0 1 1983 5–5 50.0% #389 1,533 0 0
21 1984 23–22 51.1% #49 1,777 0 1 1984 8–9 47.1% #94 1,584 0 0
22 1985 37–21 63.8% #17 1,760 0 2 1985 45–19 70.3% #13 1,883 0 2
23 1986 19–19 50.0% #39 1,795 0 2 1986 18–16 52.9% #43 1,782 0 2
24 1987 20–21 48.8% #59 1,659 0 2 1987 29–20 59.2% #32 1,824 0 2
25 1988 12–15 44.4% #111 1,668 0 2 1988 25–18 58.1% #38 1,784 0 2
26 1989 21–18 53.8% #70 1,720 0 2 1989 17–18 48.6% #65 1,732 0 3
27 1990 24–22 52.2% #44 1,771 0 3 1990 10–17 37.0% #165 1,650 0 3
28 1991 9–22 29.0% #143 1,591 0 3 1991 2–3 40.0% #433 1,641 0 3
29 1992 3–3 50.0% #300 1,613 0 3 1992 1–4 20.0% #225 1,597 0 3
30 — — — — — — — 1993 0–1 0.0% #813 1,584 0 3
31 1994 0–1 0.0% #841 1,596 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Scott Davis Paul Annacone
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1979 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1980 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1981 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1982 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1982 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1983 13 8 21 61.9% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 10 5 15 66.7% 1983 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1984 9 8 17 52.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 11 5 16 68.8% 1 7 8 12.5% 1984 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% — — — —
22 1985 24 10 34 70.6% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 9 6 15 60.0% 1985 18 7 25 72.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 20 7 27 74.1%
23 1986 9 11 20 45.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1986 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% 10 7 17 58.8%
24 1987 13 11 24 54.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 5 9 44.4% 1987 12 10 22 54.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 7 5 12 58.3%
25 1988 10 10 20 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1988 12 10 22 54.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 6 4 10 60.0%
26 1989 16 12 28 57.1% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1989 3 10 13 23.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 4 12 66.7%
27 1990 17 12 29 58.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1990 5 10 15 33.3% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
28 1991 8 14 22 36.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1991 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
29 1992 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1992 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
31 1994 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 129 107 236 54.7% 4 12 16 25.0% 30 29 59 50.8% 43 49 92 46.7% — 59 65 124 47.6% 7 8 15 46.7% 39 24 63 61.9% 55 34 89 61.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 35/38 of Scott Davis's and 9/11 of Paul Annacone's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Scott Davis Paul Annacone
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
28 1991 28/31 3.2 5.0 55.7% 66.6% 49.8% 53.7% 34.4% 59.3% 35.0% 1991 3/5 2.7 4.3 58.4% 65.0% 48.4% 58.9% 37.5% 58.0% 28.9%
29 1992 6/6 3.5 8.0 58.4% 72.7% 36.5% 49.3% 32.1% 57.2% 38.0% 1992 5/5 12.8 9.4 52.7% 72.1% 45.4% 59.5% 48.1% 59.4% 35.5%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1993 1/1 4.0 3.0 61.7% 75.9% 38.9% 0.0% 0.0% 61.7% 25.5%
31 1994 1/1 3.0 0.0 60.7% 70.6% 63.6% 60.0% — 67.9% 21.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 35/403 3.2 5.4 56.3% 67.8% 47.9% 53.1% 33.1% 59.2% 35.2% — 9/291 8.4 7.0 55.6% 70.1% 45.7% 52.7% 39.2% 59.2% 32.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Scott Davis Paul Annacone
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1979 1497 109.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1980 1484 109.8 — — — — — — — 8.3% -2.83 — — — -0.71 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1981 1522 115.7 — — — — +53 — — 36.7% -0.90 3–3 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1982 1606 136.3 — — — — +51 — — 51.9% +0.11 1–1 3–2 (60%) — -0.04 1982 1492 100.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.01
20 1983 1842 148.6 — — — — +13 -305 -271 60.9% +0.78 9–8 (53%) 11–10 (52%) — +1.09 1983 1534 110.6 — — — — +27 -19 +42 50.0% -0.04 2–2 (50%) 5–5 (50%) — +1.07
21 1984 1777 135.8 — — — — -78 -201 +5 52.6% -0.05 4–6 (40%) 7–7 (50%) — -2.22 1984 1584 121.3 — — — — -44 — +79 46.8% -0.23 2–1 (67%) 9–4 (69%) — +0.74
22 1985 1761 150.4 — — — — +68 — -38 60.0% +0.65 9–3 (75%) 7–8 (47%) — +0.21 1985 1883 150.0 — — — — +31 — -175 59.4% +0.45 18–5 (78%) 22–16 (58%) — +0.51
23 1986 1796 144.8 — — — — +41 — — 49.5% -0.16 7–8 (47%) 8–7 (53%) — -0.61 1986 1783 144.2 — — — — +8 — -28 51.1% +0.27 7–7 (50%) 4–8 (33%) — -1.82
24 1987 1659 136.0 — — — — +52 — +21 48.1% -0.16 7–6 (54%) 6–5 (55%) — -1.67 1987 1824 150.8 — — — — +2 -239 -27 58.2% +0.46 8–9 (47%) 11–12 (48%) — -3.01
25 1988 1669 130.1 — — — — +42 — -18 45.7% -0.29 5–4 (56%) 3–2 (60%) — -0.82 1988 1785 136.2 — — — — -6 -161 +14 56.0% +0.35 6–7 (46%) 5–6 (45%) — -0.06
26 1989 1721 141.0 — — — — +3 — -29 54.5% +0.22 7–5 (58%) 10–4 (71%) — -2.36 1989 1732 134.3 — — — — -17 — +69 49.5% +0.32 6–7 (46%) 4–14 (22%) — -0.38
27 1990 1771 145.5 — — — — +26 -273 -60 48.8% -0.04 14–8 (64%) 7–10 (41%) — -2.02 1990 1651 127.7 — — — — +8 — +106 44.7% -0.20 3–9 (25%) 7–10 (41%) — -0.79
28 1991 1592 127.3 -1.70 -1.91 0.862 47.6% +39 — — 33.3% -1.04 1–5 (17%) 7–7 (50%) — -0.45 1991 1641 101.3 -0.79 -2.06 0.687 45.5% — — — 40.0% -1.00 2–0 2–0 — +0.29
29 1992 1614 106.8 -2.04 -0.01 0.889 47.2% +7 — +76 52.4% -0.05 0–1 2–3 (40%) — +0.43 1992 1598 102.6 -0.71 -1.39 0.874 47.9% +11 — — 40.0% -0.73 1–4 (20%) 3–2 (60%) — -0.03
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1585 100.6 -3.42 +1.40 0.666 42.9% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — 0.00
31 1994 1596 99.5 -3.66 +0.78 0.658 45.4% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1925 147.1 -1.81 -1.51 0.862 47.5% +28 -254 -37 50.4% -0.01 67–59 (53%) 72–67 (52%) 102.8 -2.29 — 1942 144.9 -1.04 -1.30 0.788 46.6% +6 -164 -5 53.1% +0.22 55–51 (52%) 72–77 (48%) 97.0 -1.22

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.