H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Scott Davis vs Thomas Muster H2H: 1-0

Scott Davis holds a 1–0 lead over Thomas Muster in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Scott Davis leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Scott Davis won the 1991 Indian Wells Open round of 32 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Scott Davis
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Thomas Muster
AUT Age 58 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Scott Davis #65 6-3 6-2 Thomas Muster #9 Match data Mar 7, 1991* R32 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Scott Davis #852 #11 638 1,925 206 197 51.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Thomas Muster #1,092 #1 4,474 2,165 590 268 68.8% 1 8 0 4 31 44

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Scott Davis Thomas Muster
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1979 0–1 0.0% #480 1,497 0 0 1984 2–2 50.0% — 1,533 0 0
17 1980 0–4 0.0% #457 1,484 0 0 1985 9–8 52.9% #98 1,612 0 0
18 1981 4–7 36.4% — 1,521 0 0 1986 18–16 52.9% #47 1,741 0 1
19 1982 5–5 50.0% — 1,605 0 0 1987 22–16 57.9% #56 1,753 0 1
20 1983 29–16 64.4% #24 1,842 0 1 1988 47–16 74.6% #16 1,915 0 5
21 1984 23–22 51.1% #49 1,777 0 1 1989 18–10 64.3% #21 1,867 0 5
22 1985 37–21 63.8% #17 1,760 0 2 1990 45–17 72.6% #7 1,861 0 8
23 1986 19–19 50.0% #39 1,795 0 2 1991 30–18 62.5% #35 1,835 0 10
24 1987 20–21 48.8% #59 1,659 0 2 1992 39–23 62.9% #18 1,783 0 13
25 1988 12–15 44.4% #111 1,668 0 2 1993 77–21 78.6% #9 1,953 0 20
26 1989 21–18 53.8% #70 1,720 0 2 1994 54–26 67.5% #16 1,832 0 23
27 1990 24–22 52.2% #44 1,771 0 3 1995 84–17 83.2% #3 2,005 1 35
28 1991 9–22 29.0% #143 1,591 0 3 1996 65–21 75.6% #5 1,927 1 42
29 1992 3–3 50.0% #300 1,613 0 3 1997 43–23 65.2% #9 1,823 1 44
30 — — — — — — — 1998 32–20 61.5% #25 1,801 1 44
31 1994 0–1 0.0% #841 1,596 0 3 1999 5–11 31.2% #189 1,675 1 44
42 — — — — — — — 2010 0–1 0.0% #980 1,656 1 44
43 — — — — — — — 2011 0–2 0.0% #1075 1,608 1 44

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Scott Davis Thomas Muster
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1979 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1980 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1985 1 1 2 50.0% 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — — — — —
18 1981 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1986 1 5 6 16.7% 17 10 27 63.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1982 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1987 9 5 14 64.3% 13 10 23 56.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 1983 13 8 21 61.9% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 10 5 15 66.7% 1988 3 5 8 37.5% 39 9 48 81.3% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4%
21 1984 9 8 17 52.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 11 5 16 68.8% 1 7 8 12.5% 1989 12 5 17 70.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1%
22 1985 24 10 34 70.6% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 9 6 15 60.0% 1990 10 2 12 83.3% 31 10 41 75.6% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4%
23 1986 9 11 20 45.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1991 2 3 5 40.0% 28 13 41 68.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1987 13 11 24 54.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 5 9 44.4% 1992 7 5 12 58.3% 30 13 43 69.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
25 1988 10 10 20 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1993 18 7 25 72.0% 55 10 65 84.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
26 1989 16 12 28 57.1% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1994 18 10 28 64.3% 33 10 43 76.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
27 1990 17 12 29 58.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1995 9 6 15 60.0% 65 3 68 95.6% — — — — 10 8 18 55.6%
28 1991 8 14 22 36.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1996 13 8 21 61.9% 46 4 50 92.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 7 9 22.2%
29 1992 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1997 27 8 35 77.1% 8 8 16 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 11 7 18 61.1% 20 11 31 64.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
31 1994 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 4 5 9 44.4% 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — — — — —
42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 129 107 236 54.7% 4 12 16 25.0% 30 29 59 50.8% 43 49 92 46.7% — 146 85 231 63.2% 397 128 525 75.6% 6 9 15 40.0% 41 46 87 47.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 35/38 of Scott Davis's and 527/612 of Thomas Muster's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Scott Davis Thomas Muster
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 42/48 1.0 1.5 73.3% 62.9% 51.5% 61.3% 49.1% 59.6% 44.0%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 52/62 2.0 1.9 66.2% 66.6% 53.3% 60.0% 44.4% 61.5% 40.7%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1993 92/98 2.8 2.5 61.6% 71.7% 57.7% 62.0% 46.4% 66.1% 43.4%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1994 68/80 4.0 3.5 58.1% 71.4% 54.0% 56.3% 46.4% 63.9% 41.8%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 86/101 3.1 2.5 59.5% 71.9% 54.7% 56.6% 54.3% 64.8% 45.6%
28 1991 28/31 3.2 5.0 55.7% 66.6% 49.8% 53.7% 34.4% 59.3% 35.0% 1996 71/86 3.2 2.3 59.3% 72.1% 53.3% 67.9% 45.7% 64.4% 43.4%
29 1992 6/6 3.5 8.0 58.4% 72.7% 36.5% 49.3% 32.1% 57.2% 38.0% 1997 57/66 4.2 2.3 56.8% 73.4% 53.1% 65.8% 49.9% 64.4% 38.4%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 44/52 3.0 2.1 59.0% 69.3% 52.9% 59.8% 46.5% 62.1% 40.5%
31 1994 1/1 3.0 0.0 60.7% 70.6% 63.6% 60.0% — 67.9% 21.2% 1999 12/16 2.7 2.9 61.9% 62.8% 52.0% 61.2% 27.2% 58.1% 34.2%
42 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 1/1 5.0 2.0 60.6% 62.5% 61.5% 66.7% — 62.1% 21.8%
43 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 2/2 3.0 3.0 60.5% 55.9% 29.0% 35.3% 29.2% 45.6% 35.9%
Career — 35/403 3.2 5.4 56.3% 67.8% 47.9% 53.1% 33.1% 59.2% 35.2% — 527/858 3.0 2.4 61.2% 70.2% 54.1% 61.0% 47.4% 63.6% 42.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Scott Davis Thomas Muster
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1979 1497 109.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — -0.09 1984 1533 117.1 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.50 — — — -0.24
17 1980 1484 109.8 — — — — — — — 8.3% -2.83 — — — -0.71 1985 1612 126.8 — — — — — +22 — 50.0% -0.15 3–2 (60%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.07
18 1981 1522 115.7 — — — — +53 — — 36.7% -0.90 3–3 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.01 1986 1741 147.7 — — — — -223 +71 — 54.8% +0.44 4–6 (40%) 4–4 (50%) — -1.90
19 1982 1606 136.3 — — — — +51 — — 51.9% +0.11 1–1 3–2 (60%) — -0.04 1987 1754 137.1 — — — — -95 +27 — 55.2% +0.25 9–5 (64%) 11–6 (65%) — -0.14
20 1983 1842 148.6 — — — — +13 -305 -271 60.9% +0.78 9–8 (53%) 11–10 (52%) — +1.09 1988 1916 160.0 — — — — -207 +120 — 67.1% +1.44 12–2 (86%) 6–4 (60%) — -1.96
21 1984 1777 135.8 — — — — -78 -201 +5 52.6% -0.05 4–6 (40%) 7–7 (50%) — -2.22 1989 1868 141.2 — — — — -42 +130 — 64.5% +0.91 3–4 (43%) 6–2 (75%) — +0.55
22 1985 1761 150.4 — — — — +68 — -38 60.0% +0.65 9–3 (75%) 7–8 (47%) — +0.21 1990 1862 152.4 — — — — -32 +106 — 65.8% +0.93 13–4 (76%) 14–5 (74%) — +0.89
23 1986 1796 144.8 — — — — +41 — — 49.5% -0.16 7–8 (47%) 8–7 (53%) — -0.61 1991 1836 142.4 -0.24 +3.28 1.088 51.7% -95 +121 — 58.8% +0.61 12–9 (57%) 7–6 (54%) — -0.44
24 1987 1659 136.0 — — — — +52 — +21 48.1% -0.16 7–6 (54%) 6–5 (55%) — -1.67 1992 1783 142.2 +0.70 +1.68 1.059 50.8% -81 +156 — 56.4% +0.48 16–5 (76%) 9–11 (45%) — +0.43
25 1988 1669 130.1 — — — — +42 — -18 45.7% -0.29 5–4 (56%) 3–2 (60%) — -0.82 1993 1954 154.4 +4.84 +4.04 1.280 54.2% -117 +137 — 71.5% +1.48 17–7 (71%) 16–17 (48%) — +2.71
26 1989 1721 141.0 — — — — +3 — -29 54.5% +0.22 7–5 (58%) 10–4 (71%) — -2.36 1994 1832 152.5 +2.55 +2.88 1.158 52.7% +6 +172 — 65.5% +1.10 15–12 (56%) 18–13 (58%) — +0.94
27 1990 1771 145.5 — — — — +26 -273 -60 48.8% -0.04 14–8 (64%) 7–10 (41%) — -2.02 1995 2006 162.1 +3.78 +6.50 1.294 54.8% -159 +281 — 75.0% +1.55 20–9 (69%) 27–8 (77%) — -0.55
28 1991 1592 127.3 -1.70 -1.91 0.862 47.6% +39 — — 33.3% -1.04 1–5 (17%) 7–7 (50%) — -0.45 1996 1928 153.9 +2.83 +4.89 1.219 53.6% -136 +345 -340 71.6% +1.36 15–5 (75%) 19–9 (68%) — +1.60
29 1992 1614 106.8 -2.04 -0.01 0.889 47.2% +7 — +76 52.4% -0.05 0–1 2–3 (40%) — +0.43 1997 1824 152.8 +2.58 +1.22 1.077 51.5% +70 +208 -208 61.7% +0.64 12–9 (57%) 17–10 (63%) — -0.07
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1801 149.6 +0.50 +1.96 1.068 51.4% +43 +123 — 56.8% +0.65 11–3 (79%) 3–8 (27%) — -1.16
31 1994 1596 99.5 -3.66 +0.78 0.658 45.4% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.01 1999 1676 130.2 -0.85 -2.23 0.815 47.0% +114 +110 — 35.0% -0.85 2–2 (50%) 2–3 (40%) — -1.42
42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1656 99.5 -1.45 +0.41 0.576 43.8% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — +0.12
43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1609 96.4 -3.83 -0.41 0.661 41.0% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.06
Career — 1925 147.1 -1.81 -1.51 0.862 47.5% +28 -254 -37 50.4% -0.01 67–59 (53%) 72–67 (52%) 102.8 -2.29 — 2165 156.5 +2.51 +3.47 1.162 52.7% -56 +164 -287 64.1% +0.95 164–84 (66%) 161–108 (60%) 106.5 -0.06

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.