H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC
Scott Davis vs Tim Mayotte H2H: 1-2
Tim Mayotte holds a 2–1 lead over Scott Davis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Tim Mayotte leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Scott Davis leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Scott Davis won the 1986 Chicago fourth round 6-1 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 63
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 65
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 1986* | Chicago | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Scott Davis | 6-1 7-6 | Tim Mayotte | Match data |
| Mar 20, 1986* | Fort Myers | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Tim Mayotte | 6-4 6-3 | Scott Davis | Match data |
| Feb 11, 1985* | Delray Beach | Masters 1000 | F | Hard | Tim Mayotte | 4-6 4-6 6-3 6-2 6-4 | Scott Davis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scott Davis | #852 | #11 | 638 | 1,923 | 206 | 197 | 51.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Tim Mayotte | #1,103 | #7 | 1,274 | 2,047 | 333 | 194 | 63.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Scott Davis | Tim Mayotte | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #480 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1980 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #457 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1981 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #457 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #420 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1982 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #273 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #171 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1983 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #24 | 1,841 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 31–16 | 66.0% | #33 | 1,800 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1984 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #49 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #30 | 1,809 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1985 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #17 | 1,760 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #16 | 1,902 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1986 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #39 | 1,795 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #44 | 1,765 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1987 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #59 | 1,660 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 48–19 | 71.6% | #12 | 1,919 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1988 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #111 | 1,668 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #15 | 1,855 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1989 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #70 | 1,720 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 44–13 | 77.2% | #9 | 1,981 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 1990 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #44 | 1,771 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 42–15 | 73.7% | #10 | 1,909 | 0 | 11 |
| 28 | 1991 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #143 | 1,590 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 29–15 | 65.9% | #13 | 1,913 | 0 | 12 |
| 29 | 1992 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #300 | 1,613 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #37 | 1,745 | 0 | 12 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #115 | 1,716 | 0 | 12 |
| 31 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #841 | 1,596 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1097 | 1,698 | 0 | 12 |