H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC
Scott Draper vs Cedric Pioline H2H: 1-2
Cedric Pioline holds a 2–1 lead over Scott Draper in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Cedric Pioline leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Scott Draper leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Cedric Pioline won the 1999 Sydney third round 6-4 7-6(2).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 52
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 57
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 1999* | Sydney | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Cedric Pioline | 6-4 7-6(2) | Scott Draper | Match data |
| Jun 19, 1998* | Nottingham | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Scott Draper | 6-3 1-1 DEF | Cedric Pioline | Match data |
| Mar 20, 1996* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Cedric Pioline | 6-4 6-2 | Scott Draper | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scott Draper | #1,110 | #42 | 957 | 1,832 | 107 | 126 | 45.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Cedric Pioline | #750 | #5 | 2,335 | 1,983 | 370 | 301 | 55.1% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Scott Draper | Cedric Pioline | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #87 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #118 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #95 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #51 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #58 | 1,719 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #33 | 1,845 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #51 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 51–27 | 65.4% | #10 | 1,936 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1999 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #154 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 29–28 | 50.9% | #51 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2000 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #258 | 1,589 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #54 | 1,760 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2001 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #221 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #21 | 1,805 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2002 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #137 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #20 | 1,834 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2003 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #103 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #18 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #13 | 1,795 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2005 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #718 | 1,635 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #16 | 1,760 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #84 | 1,657 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #119 | 1,618 | 0 | 5 |