H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Scott Draper vs Cristiano Caratti H2H: 2-1
Scott Draper holds a 2–1 lead over Cristiano Caratti in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Cristiano Caratti leads 1–0 on carpet, while Scott Draper leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Scott Draper won the 2002 Wimbledon first round 6-3 4-6 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 52
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 56
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2002* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Scott Draper | 6-3 4-6 6-4 7-5 | Cristiano Caratti | Match data |
| Oct 11, 1995* | Tokyo Indoor | ATP 250 | R64 | Carpet | Cristiano Caratti | 6-3 7-6(2) | Scott Draper | Match data |
| Aug 30, 1995* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Scott Draper | 6-2 6-3 3-6 6-3 | Cristiano Caratti | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scott Draper | #1,110 | #42 | 957 | 1,832 | 107 | 126 | 45.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Cristiano Caratti | #836 | #26 | 932 | 1,806 | 71 | 115 | 38.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Scott Draper | Cristiano Caratti | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #232 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #98 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #87 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #95 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #160 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #58 | 1,719 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #129 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #51 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #82 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1999 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #154 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #140 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2000 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #258 | 1,589 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #156 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2001 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #221 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #138 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2002 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #137 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2003 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #103 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #213 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #135 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2005 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #718 | 1,635 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #238 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #470 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |