H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Scott Draper vs Dennis van Scheppingen H2H: 0-1
Dennis van Scheppingen holds a 1–0 lead over Scott Draper in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Dennis van Scheppingen leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Dennis van Scheppingen won the 1998 Miami Masters first round 6-7(3) 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 52
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
NED
Age 51
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 1998* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Dennis van Scheppingen | 6-7(3) 7-5 6-3 | Scott Draper | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scott Draper | #1,110 | #42 | 957 | 1,832 | 107 | 126 | 45.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Dennis van Scheppingen | #1,545 | #72 | 552 | 1,666 | 42 | 73 | 36.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Scott Draper | Dennis van Scheppingen | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #764 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #732 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #113 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #87 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #120 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #95 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #120 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #58 | 1,719 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #439 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #51 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #206 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1999 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #154 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #121 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2000 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #258 | 1,589 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #156 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2001 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #221 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2002 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #137 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #112 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2003 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #103 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #251 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2005 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #718 | 1,635 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #358 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |