H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Scott Draper vs Jared Palmer H2H: 0-1
Jared Palmer holds a 1–0 lead over Scott Draper in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jared Palmer leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jared Palmer won the 1995 Wimbledon first round 5-7 3-6 7-5 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 52
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 1995* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Jared Palmer | 5-7 3-6 7-5 6-2 6-3 | Scott Draper | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scott Draper | #1,110 | #42 | 957 | 1,832 | 107 | 126 | 45.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Jared Palmer | #1,385 | #35 | 908 | 1,812 | 69 | 80 | 46.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Scott Draper | Jared Palmer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #517 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #240 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #564 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #427 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #149 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #87 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #105 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #95 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #36 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1997 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #58 | 1,719 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #125 | 1,721 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1998 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #51 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #214 | 1,654 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1999 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #154 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2000 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #258 | 1,589 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #174 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2001 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #221 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #435 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2002 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #137 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #357 | 1,623 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2003 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #103 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2005 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #718 | 1,635 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |