H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC
Scott Draper vs Jeff Tarango H2H: 3-0
Scott Draper holds a 3–0 lead over Jeff Tarango in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Scott Draper leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Scott Draper won the 1997 US Open third round 7-6(6) 3-6 2-6 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 52
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 57
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 1997* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Scott Draper | 7-6(6) 3-6 2-6 6-4 6-4 | Jeff Tarango | Match data |
| Jan 4, 1997* | Adelaide | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Scott Draper | 6-1 3-6 6-2 | Jeff Tarango | Match data |
| Jun 2, 1996* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Scott Draper | 6-1 6-2 6-3 | Jeff Tarango | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scott Draper | #1,110 | #42 | 957 | 1,832 | 107 | 126 | 45.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Jeff Tarango | #1,001 | #42 | 877 | 1,787 | 239 | 293 | 44.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Scott Draper | Jeff Tarango | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #377 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #96 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #137 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #87 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #131 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #95 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #106 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #58 | 1,719 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #45 | 1,694 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1998 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #51 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #91 | 1,670 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1999 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #154 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #78 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2000 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #258 | 1,589 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #76 | 1,661 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2001 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #221 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #106 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2002 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #137 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 31–29 | 51.7% | #49 | 1,692 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2003 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #103 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 24–29 | 45.3% | #73 | 1,660 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #55 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2005 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #718 | 1,635 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 10–24 | 29.4% | #112 | 1,515 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #323 | 1,452 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #730 | 1,446 | 0 | 2 |