H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Scott Draper vs Justin Gimelstob H2H: 3-1

Scott Draper holds a 3–1 lead over Justin Gimelstob in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Scott Draper leads 2–0 on grass, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Scott Draper won the 1999 Adelaide International round of 32 3-6 7-6(6) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Scott Draper
AUS Age 52 Left-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Justin Gimelstob
USA Age 49 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Scott Draper #51 3-6 7-6(6) 6-3 Justin Gimelstob #80 Match data Jan 7, 1999* R32 Adelaide International ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Scott Draper #73 6-3 4-6 7-6(4) Justin Gimelstob #111 Match data Jun 18, 1998* R32 Eastbourne Open ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass
Justin Gimelstob #100 6-3 6-1 Scott Draper #63 Match data Jul 31, 1997* R32 Canadian Open Masters 1000 Hard
Scott Draper #68 6-4 7-5 Justin Gimelstob #119 Match data Jun 19, 1997* R32 Eastbourne Open World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Scott Draper #1,110 #42 957 1,818 107 126 45.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Justin Gimelstob #841 #63 733 1,722 107 171 38.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Scott Draper Justin Gimelstob
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1995 1–1 50.0% — 1,529 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1996 3–9 25.0% #152 1,510 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1997 17–23 42.5% #104 1,630 0 0
21 1995 13–13 50.0% #87 1,645 0 0 1998 14–15 48.3% #80 1,661 0 0
22 1996 18–24 42.9% #95 1,668 0 0 1999 17–26 39.5% #82 1,645 0 0
23 1997 23–20 53.5% #58 1,721 0 0 2000 14–16 46.7% #97 1,675 0 0
24 1998 23–17 57.5% #51 1,780 0 1 2001 3–12 20.0% #177 1,595 0 0
25 1999 11–17 39.3% #154 1,625 0 1 2002 5–6 45.5% #106 1,619 0 0
26 2000 2–5 28.6% #258 1,588 0 1 2003 9–17 34.6% #106 1,532 0 0
27 2001 2–5 28.6% #221 1,595 0 1 2004 1–5 16.7% #162 1,507 0 0
28 2002 2–5 28.6% #137 1,608 0 1 2005 8–9 47.1% #104 1,595 0 0
29 2003 13–16 44.8% #103 1,686 0 1 2006 14–20 41.2% #86 1,606 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2007 1–12 7.7% #556 1,537 0 0
31 2005 0–4 0.0% #718 1,635 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Scott Draper Justin Gimelstob
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 15 16 31 48.4% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
21 1995 6 6 12 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1998 5 7 12 41.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 1996 10 13 23 43.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 1999 13 16 29 44.8% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1997 16 11 27 59.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 10 9 19 52.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
24 1998 12 11 23 52.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 10 3 13 76.9% — — — — 2001 2 10 12 16.7% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
25 1999 6 9 15 40.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2002 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
26 2000 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2003 5 11 16 31.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
27 2001 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2004 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2002 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2005 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
29 2003 11 11 22 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2006 6 13 19 31.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2005 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 64 71 135 47.4% 14 24 38 36.8% 22 23 45 48.9% 7 8 15 46.7% — 71 112 183 38.8% 8 17 25 32.0% 24 35 59 40.7% 4 7 11 36.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 197/233 of Scott Draper's and 259/278 of Justin Gimelstob's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Scott Draper Justin Gimelstob
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 2/2 8.0 5.0 62.7% 69.5% 44.6% 68.1% 31.7% 59.4% 30.5%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 10/12 5.1 3.4 54.9% 73.3% 46.5% 41.8% 50.8% 61.4% 35.3%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1997 36/40 6.0 5.8 58.7% 71.8% 44.8% 51.3% 37.8% 60.5% 35.9%
21 1995 20/26 8.3 3.3 55.3% 72.8% 49.9% 66.8% 46.7% 62.4% 30.9% 1998 26/29 5.5 3.9 59.7% 72.6% 47.9% 55.6% 44.3% 62.5% 39.5%
22 1996 32/42 5.7 2.5 53.4% 71.2% 53.3% 52.1% 40.9% 62.6% 35.5% 1999 37/43 6.9 3.9 60.4% 72.2% 47.6% 56.4% 39.5% 62.4% 35.7%
23 1997 38/43 6.8 3.1 55.5% 72.4% 49.6% 55.6% 43.0% 62.1% 36.9% 2000 29/30 8.3 4.4 58.7% 73.7% 49.6% 57.8% 36.8% 63.2% 37.6%
24 1998 35/40 6.3 2.8 55.2% 72.1% 51.1% 57.1% 49.0% 62.4% 35.4% 2001 13/15 5.6 5.7 55.5% 71.2% 45.9% 45.8% 36.3% 59.8% 34.1%
25 1999 22/28 5.4 3.1 57.6% 70.2% 50.8% 58.1% 41.7% 62.2% 33.5% 2002 10/11 5.5 5.7 53.9% 69.8% 43.4% 49.0% 29.6% 57.9% 37.0%
26 2000 4/7 7.5 4.3 52.8% 73.2% 45.8% 52.5% 57.8% 60.3% 29.4% 2003 26/26 7.3 4.2 54.5% 73.8% 45.2% 63.5% 42.7% 60.7% 36.5%
27 2001 6/7 12.0 4.0 55.0% 74.3% 51.1% 61.3% 25.3% 63.9% 32.3% 2004 6/6 4.5 5.5 48.7% 73.2% 49.4% 40.7% 26.3% 60.7% 35.9%
28 2002 7/7 4.9 3.3 61.8% 70.7% 57.8% 51.1% 35.6% 65.5% 34.5% 2005 17/17 11.4 4.9 56.8% 77.1% 52.2% 59.4% 40.1% 66.2% 35.8%
29 2003 29/29 7.2 2.1 60.4% 73.0% 56.1% 61.2% 29.1% 66.1% 33.1% 2006 34/34 7.0 2.9 56.6% 72.4% 47.8% 63.7% 36.2% 61.7% 34.9%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 13/13 4.3 4.8 57.1% 65.3% 43.1% 49.5% 26.4% 55.8% 29.5%
31 2005 4/4 9.0 4.0 60.4% 68.5% 43.9% 52.7% 35.0% 59.3% 30.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 197/233 6.7 2.9 56.3% 72.0% 51.7% 57.4% 41.3% 63.0% 34.4% — 259/278 6.8 4.4 57.4% 72.4% 47.1% 55.6% 38.2% 61.5% 35.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Scott Draper Justin Gimelstob
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1530 110.0 -1.36 +1.92 0.750 45.8% — — — 37.5% -0.63 1–0 — — -0.13
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1510 118.9 +0.13 +0.36 0.915 48.2% +28 — — 29.6% -0.93 1–2 (33%) 1–4 (20%) — -0.63
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1630 134.5 -1.35 -0.78 0.909 48.5% +30 — -55 43.3% -0.47 7–6 (54%) 10–8 (56%) — +0.60
21 1995 1646 127.4 +0.52 -4.44 0.822 48.0% -4 -14 -116 47.4% -0.29 5–3 (63%) 9–5 (64%) — +0.44 1998 1661 129.0 +0.39 +1.22 1.052 50.8% -10 -75 -71 50.7% +0.12 6–8 (43%) 4–9 (31%) — -0.12
22 1996 1668 137.5 +0.51 -0.73 0.950 49.1% -21 -28 -127 47.7% -0.05 5–8 (38%) 6–7 (46%) — -2.02 1999 1645 137.7 -0.21 -1.19 0.949 49.1% +36 -75 -122 45.0% -0.28 3–10 (23%) 7–12 (37%) — -1.22
23 1997 1721 137.1 +0.33 -0.08 0.975 49.5% +8 -51 -109 51.3% -0.20 10–7 (59%) 14–9 (61%) — -0.28 2000 1675 126.8 +0.05 +0.25 1.022 50.4% +34 -174 -115 47.5% -0.40 5–7 (42%) 10–6 (63%) — +0.17
24 1998 1780 130.1 +1.17 -1.22 0.942 49.1% -47 -150 -49 51.0% -0.22 11–5 (69%) 14–7 (67%) — -1.06 2001 1596 108.5 -1.35 -2.71 0.849 47.0% +17 — -76 29.3% -1.39 2–4 (33%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.32
25 1999 1625 132.1 -0.25 -1.66 0.885 47.9% +60 -47 +81 37.7% -0.64 5–2 (71%) 7–12 (37%) — -1.27 2002 1620 119.3 -1.95 +1.16 0.880 46.9% +9 — -59 40.7% -0.81 2–0 1–2 (33%) — -0.03
26 2000 1589 108.5 -1.83 -0.72 0.740 46.1% +32 — +107 33.3% -0.67 1–2 (33%) 1–4 (20%) — +0.20 2003 1532 117.2 -2.07 -0.87 0.929 48.9% +13 — +76 40.0% -0.51 3–5 (38%) 3–7 (30%) — +1.70
27 2001 1596 118.4 +0.20 -0.50 0.893 48.3% +20 — — 38.1% -0.57 0–3 (0%) 1–0 — +0.01 2004 1507 110.1 -0.55 -0.52 0.913 47.3% +4 — — 23.1% -1.69 0–3 (0%) — — -0.42
28 2002 1608 122.9 +1.18 +0.46 0.999 49.6% -20 — — 33.3% -0.57 0–1 0–3 (0%) — -0.59 2005 1596 127.5 +2.04 +0.31 1.059 51.1% -56 — +71 48.9% +0.08 2–5 (29%) 6–7 (46%) — -0.05
29 2003 1686 136.7 +2.23 -1.75 0.975 49.3% +6 — +45 43.7% -0.51 2–4 (33%) 9–7 (56%) — -2.06 2006 1606 122.4 -0.69 -1.72 0.913 49.0% -77 -132 +106 44.9% -0.32 3–5 (38%) 6–7 (46%) — +0.54
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1537 116.4 -4.94 -3.75 0.668 43.5% -37 — +128 10.0% -2.37 0–1 0–2 — -0.45
31 2005 1636 98.8 +0.70 -0.30 0.752 45.3% — — — 26.7% -2.00 0–2 2–2 (50%) — -0.79 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1818 137.9 +0.73 -1.26 0.927 48.8% -3 -51 -27 45.5% -0.36 39–37 (51%) 63–56 (53%) 105.9 -3.20 — 1722 132.5 -0.75 -0.68 0.933 48.8% +5 -103 -6 41.7% -0.51 35–56 (38%) 51–68 (43%) 92.8 +0.10

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.