H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC
Scott Draper vs Patrick Rafter H2H: 2-1
Scott Draper holds a 2–1 lead over Patrick Rafter in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Scott Draper leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Patrick Rafter won the 2001 Australian Open first round 6-3 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 52
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 53
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2001* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Patrick Rafter | 6-3 6-2 7-5 | Scott Draper | Match data |
| Jun 11, 1998* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Scott Draper | 4-6 7-5 6-4 | Patrick Rafter | Match data |
| May 2, 1996* | Atlanta | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Scott Draper | 7-6(7) 6-4 | Patrick Rafter | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scott Draper | #1,110 | #42 | 957 | 1,832 | 107 | 126 | 45.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Patrick Rafter | #224 | #1 | 3,673 | 2,104 | 332 | 177 | 65.2% | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Scott Draper | Patrick Rafter | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #293 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #87 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #20 | 1,803 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1996 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #95 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #66 | 1,777 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1997 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #58 | 1,719 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #62 | 1,761 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1998 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #51 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 63–26 | 70.8% | #2 | 2,035 | 1 | 2 |
| 25 | 1999 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #154 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 58–20 | 74.4% | #4 | 2,010 | 2 | 8 |
| 26 | 2000 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #258 | 1,589 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 31–16 | 66.0% | #16 | 1,933 | 2 | 9 |
| 27 | 2001 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #221 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #15 | 1,889 | 2 | 10 |
| 28 | 2002 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #137 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 42–15 | 73.7% | #7 | 1,989 | 2 | 11 |
| 29 | 2003 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #103 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2005 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #718 | 1,635 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |