H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Scott Draper vs Paul Goldstein H2H: 0-1
Paul Goldstein holds a 1–0 lead over Scott Draper in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Paul Goldstein leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Paul Goldstein won the 1999 US Open first round 6-3 6-1 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 52
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 49
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 1999* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Paul Goldstein | 6-3 6-1 6-0 | Scott Draper | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scott Draper | #1,110 | #42 | 957 | 1,832 | 107 | 126 | 45.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Paul Goldstein | #1,120 | #58 | 668 | 1,746 | 85 | 115 | 42.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Scott Draper | Paul Goldstein | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #781 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1219 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1011 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #432 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #87 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #189 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #95 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #89 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #58 | 1,719 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #81 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #51 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #143 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1999 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #154 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #182 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2000 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #258 | 1,589 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #107 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2001 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #221 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #190 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2002 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #137 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #67 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2003 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #103 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #70 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #166 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2005 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #718 | 1,635 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |