H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Scott Draper vs Stefan Edberg H2H: 0-1
Stefan Edberg holds a 1–0 lead over Scott Draper in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Stefan Edberg leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Stefan Edberg won the 1996 Los Angeles quarterfinal 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 52
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 60
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 1996* | Los Angeles | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Stefan Edberg | 6-3 6-4 | Scott Draper | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scott Draper | #1,110 | #42 | 957 | 1,832 | 107 | 126 | 45.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Stefan Edberg | #1,347 | #1 | 3,997 | 2,233 | 744 | 246 | 75.2% | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 29 | 41 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Scott Draper | Stefan Edberg | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #54 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 27–18 | 60.0% | #20 | 1,823 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 58–17 | 77.3% | #5 | 2,129 | 1 | 5 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 66–20 | 76.7% | #5 | 2,121 | 1 | 8 |
| 21 | 1995 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #87 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 75–12 | 86.2% | #2 | 2,206 | 2 | 15 |
| 22 | 1996 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #95 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 54–15 | 78.3% | #5 | 2,080 | 3 | 18 |
| 23 | 1997 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #58 | 1,719 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 58–16 | 78.4% | #3 | 2,149 | 3 | 20 |
| 24 | 1998 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #51 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 67–13 | 83.8% | #1 | 2,172 | 4 | 27 |
| 25 | 1999 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #154 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 73–14 | 83.9% | #1 | 2,146 | 5 | 33 |
| 26 | 2000 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #258 | 1,589 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 64–19 | 77.1% | #2 | 2,044 | 6 | 36 |
| 27 | 2001 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #221 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 58–22 | 72.5% | #5 | 1,986 | 6 | 37 |
| 28 | 2002 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #137 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 53–23 | 69.7% | #7 | 1,854 | 6 | 40 |
| 29 | 2003 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #103 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #23 | 1,823 | 6 | 41 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 44–25 | 63.8% | #14 | 1,890 | 6 | 41 |
| 31 | 2005 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #718 | 1,635 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |