H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Scott Draper vs Todd Woodbridge H2H: 0-3
Todd Woodbridge holds a 3–0 lead over Scott Draper in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Todd Woodbridge leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Todd Woodbridge won the 2001 Wimbledon first round 5-7 6-3 3-6 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 52
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 55
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2001* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Todd Woodbridge | 5-7 6-3 3-6 7-5 6-3 | Scott Draper | Match data |
| Jan 5, 1997* | Adelaide | ATP 250 | F | Hard | Todd Woodbridge | 6-2 6-1 | Scott Draper | Match data |
| Aug 12, 1996 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Todd Woodbridge | 6-3 6-4 | Scott Draper | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scott Draper | #1,110 | #42 | 957 | 1,832 | 107 | 126 | 45.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Todd Woodbridge | #1,151 | #19 | 1,575 | 1,857 | 237 | 229 | 50.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Scott Draper | Todd Woodbridge | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #213 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #131 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #50 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #77 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #87 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #54 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #95 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #109 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #58 | 1,719 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #90 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #51 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #33 | 1,810 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1999 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #154 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #36 | 1,744 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2000 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #258 | 1,589 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #26 | 1,796 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2001 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #221 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,714 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2002 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #137 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #197 | 1,601 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2003 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #103 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #187 | 1,588 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #207 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2005 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #718 | 1,635 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |