H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Scott Draper vs Wayne Black H2H: 2-0
Scott Draper holds a 2–0 lead over Wayne Black in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Scott Draper leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Scott Draper won the 1998 Washington third round 4-6 6-3 7-6(6).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 52
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ZIM
Age 52
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 1998* | Washington | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Scott Draper | 4-6 6-3 7-6(6) | Wayne Black | Match data |
| Nov 9, 1995* | Moscow | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Scott Draper | 6-1 7-6(4) | Wayne Black | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scott Draper | #1,110 | #42 | 957 | 1,832 | 107 | 126 | 45.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Wayne Black | #1,469 | #69 | 646 | 1,721 | 52 | 81 | 39.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Scott Draper | Wayne Black | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #719 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #360 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #87 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #194 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #95 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #252 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #58 | 1,719 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #99 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #51 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #94 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1999 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #154 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #151 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2000 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #258 | 1,589 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #107 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2001 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #221 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #160 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2002 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #137 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #417 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2003 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #103 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #302 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2005 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #718 | 1,635 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |