H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 10:33 UTC
Sebastian Baez vs Laslo Djere H2H: 2-1
Sebastian Baez holds a 2–1 lead over Laslo Djere in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Sebastian Baez leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Laslo Djere won the 2025 BCI Seguros Chile Open final 6-4 3-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Argentina
Age 25
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
Serbia
Age 31
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2025* | BCI Seguros Chile Open | ATP 250 | F | Clay | Laslo Djere | 6-4 3-6 7-5 | Sebastian Baez | Match data |
| Aug 25, 2023* | Winston-Salem | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Sebastian Baez | 6-3 6-0 | Laslo Djere | Match data |
| Mar 4, 2023* | Santiago | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Sebastian Baez | 7-6(4) 6-4 | Laslo Djere | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sebastian Baez | #56 | #18 | 2,250 | 1,896 | 117 | 120 | 49.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 7 |
| Laslo Djere | #220 | #27 | 1,342 | 1,862 | 152 | 163 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sebastian Baez | Laslo Djere | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #495 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #99 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #186 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2022 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #43 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2023 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #28 | 1,797 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #88 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2024 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #27 | 1,712 | 0 | 6 | 2018 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #93 | 1,719 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2025 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #45 | 1,621 | 0 | 7 | 2019 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #38 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2026 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #56 | 1,691 | 0 | 7 | 2020 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #57 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #52 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #70 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 33–25 | 56.9% | #33 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #115 | 1,734 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #98 | 1,692 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #220 | 1,649 | 0 | 3 |