H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Sebastian Baez vs Thomaz Bellucci H2H: 1-0
Sebastian Baez holds a 1–0 lead over Thomaz Bellucci in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sebastian Baez leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sebastian Baez won the 2023 Rio de Janeiro third round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Argentina
Age 25
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 38
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 2023* | Rio de Janeiro | ATP 500 | R32 | Clay | Sebastian Baez | 6-3 6-2 | Thomaz Bellucci | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sebastian Baez | #56 | #18 | 2,250 | 1,896 | 117 | 120 | 49.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 7 |
| Thomaz Bellucci | #1,303 | #21 | 1,732 | 1,937 | 179 | 201 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sebastian Baez | Thomaz Bellucci | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #99 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #85 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2022 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #43 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #36 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2023 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #28 | 1,797 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #31 | 1,795 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2024 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #27 | 1,712 | 0 | 6 | 2011 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #37 | 1,710 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2025 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #45 | 1,621 | 0 | 7 | 2012 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #33 | 1,828 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2026 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #56 | 1,691 | 0 | 7 | 2013 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #125 | 1,676 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #65 | 1,818 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #37 | 1,856 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #61 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #113 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #225 | 1,654 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #449 | 1,610 | 0 | 4 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1303 | 1,598 | 0 | 4 |