Sebastien De Chaunac
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robby Ginepri | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jul 22, 2009 | H2H |
| Ivan Ljubicic | 0 | 1 | 1 | Sep 24, 2009 | H2H |
| John Isner | 0 | 1 | 1 | Aug 7, 2009 | H2H |
| Dmitry Tursunov | 1 | 0 | 1 | Aug 5, 2009 | H2H |
| Denis Istomin | 1 | 0 | 1 | Aug 4, 2009 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-09 00:00 UTC
Sebastien De Chaunac vs Nicolaas Scholtz
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Sebastien De Chaunac vs Nicolaas Scholtz.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
0
0 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sebastien De Chaunac | 6-2 6-3 | Nicolaas Scholtz | Match data | Feb 3, 2009* | Q3 | Johannesburg | ATP 250 | Hard |
1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sebastien De Chaunac | #952 | #130 | 428 | 1,657 | 11 | 22 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nicolaas Scholtz | #1,416 | #320 | 146 | 1,539 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sebastien De Chaunac | Nicolaas Scholtz | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #660 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #186 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #206 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2004 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #220 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2005 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #236 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #601 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #377 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #245 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2009 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #140 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Sebastien De Chaunac | Nicolaas Scholtz | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1506 | 99.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1490 | 98.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1524 | 104.1 | -2.76 | -4.32 | 0.587 | 44.7% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.00 | — | — | — | +0.21 |
| 22 | 2000 | 1501 | 101.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2001 | 1529 | 100.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.33 | — | — | — | -0.16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2002 | 1522 | 107.8 | — | — | — | — | — | +7 | — | 36.4% | -1.18 | 1–1 | 1–1 | — | -0.05 | 2015 | 1514 | 99.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2003 | 1494 | 103.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2004 | 1525 | 112.4 | -2.44 | -1.09 | 0.759 | 45.9% | +87 | — | — | 31.6% | -1.26 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.13 | 2017 | 1501 | 95.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2005 | 1493 | 107.9 | -1.10 | -0.18 | 0.905 | 48.4% | +56 | — | — | 28.6% | -0.64 | 0–2 | 0–4 (0%) | — | -0.12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2006 | 1472 | 99.4 | +1.35 | -1.93 | 0.620 | 44.5% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | -0.10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2007 | 1507 | 103.5 | +3.84 | +0.85 | 0.893 | 48.3% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.00 | 0–1 | 1–1 | — | -0.19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2008 | 1514 | 114.1 | -0.58 | -2.29 | 0.641 | 43.1% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -2.20 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | -0.13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2009 | 1614 | 118.1 | -2.48 | -0.79 | 0.878 | 48.2% | +39 | — | — | 46.4% | -0.64 | 3–2 (60%) | 4–3 (57%) | 102.6 | +0.41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2010 | 1544 | 99.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1657 | 114.1 | -1.67 | -0.83 | 0.821 | 47.1% | +58 | +7 | — | 34.1% | -1.09 | 6–9 (40%) | 8–11 (42%) | 98.9 | -1.47 | — | 1539 | 99.0 | -2.76 | -4.32 | 0.587 | 44.7% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.00 | — | — | — | +21.00 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Nicolaas Scholtz
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Denis Gremelmayr | 0 | 1 | 1 | Feb 3, 2011 | H2H |