H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Sebastien Grosjean vs Cecil Mamiit H2H: 3-0
Sebastien Grosjean holds a 3–0 lead over Cecil Mamiit in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Sebastien Grosjean leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sebastien Grosjean won the 2000 Canada Masters second round 6-2 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 48
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
PHI
Age 50
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2, 2000* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Sebastien Grosjean | 6-2 7-6(5) | Cecil Mamiit | Match data |
| May 8, 1999* | Delray Beach | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Sebastien Grosjean | 6-2 6-1 | Cecil Mamiit | Match data |
| Apr 29, 1999* | Atlanta | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Sebastien Grosjean | 6-7(6) 7-5 6-1 | Cecil Mamiit | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sebastien Grosjean | #720 | #4 | 2,865 | 1,960 | 320 | 236 | 57.6% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
| Cecil Mamiit | #1,573 | #72 | 625 | 1,633 | 48 | 95 | 33.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sebastien Grosjean | Cecil Mamiit | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1997 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #145 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1998 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #88 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #200 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1999 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #27 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #229 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2000 | 42–27 | 60.9% | #19 | 1,836 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #130 | 1,432 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2001 | 48–23 | 67.6% | #6 | 1,943 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #93 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2002 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #17 | 1,907 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #121 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2003 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #10 | 1,804 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #111 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2004 | 25–14 | 64.1% | #15 | 1,821 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #111 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2005 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #25 | 1,842 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #183 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2006 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #28 | 1,767 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #226 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2007 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #53 | 1,765 | 0 | 4 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #209 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2008 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #170 | 1,650 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2009 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #677 | 1,620 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #722 | 1,578 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #462 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |