H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Sebastien Grosjean vs Harel Levy H2H: 0-1
Harel Levy holds a 1–0 lead over Sebastien Grosjean in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Harel Levy leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Harel Levy won the 2000 Canada Masters fourth round 6-3 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 48
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ISR
Age 47
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 2000* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Harel Levy | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | Sebastien Grosjean | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sebastien Grosjean | #720 | #4 | 2,865 | 1,960 | 320 | 236 | 57.6% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
| Harel Levy | #1,024 | #30 | 1,023 | 1,732 | 43 | 83 | 34.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sebastien Grosjean | Harel Levy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1997 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #145 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #224 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1998 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #88 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #183 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1999 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #27 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #59 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2000 | 42–27 | 60.9% | #19 | 1,836 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #78 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2001 | 48–23 | 67.6% | #6 | 1,943 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #252 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2002 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #17 | 1,907 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #111 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2003 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #10 | 1,804 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #247 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2004 | 25–14 | 64.1% | #15 | 1,821 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2005 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #25 | 1,842 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #286 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2006 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #28 | 1,767 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #161 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2007 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #53 | 1,765 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #248 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2008 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #170 | 1,650 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #119 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2009 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #677 | 1,620 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #342 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #722 | 1,578 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |