H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Sebastien Grosjean vs Nicolas Kiefer H2H: 3-4

Nicolas Kiefer holds a 4–3 lead over Sebastien Grosjean in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Nicolas Kiefer leads 4–1 on hard courts, while Sebastien Grosjean leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Nicolas Kiefer won the 2009 Lyon third round 4-6 7-6(7) 7-6(2).

FRA Age 48 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3 4
7 main draw meetings
GER Age 49 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 29, 2009* Lyon ATP 250 R32 Hard Nicolas Kiefer #98 4-6 7-6(7) 7-6(2) Sebastien Grosjean #711 Match data
Jan 27, 2006* Australian Open Grand Slam QF Hard Nicolas Kiefer #25 6-3 0-6 6-4 6-7(1) 8-6 Sebastien Grosjean #28 Match data
May 12, 2005* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Sebastien Grosjean #27 2-6 6-3 6-4 Nicolas Kiefer #29 Match data
Mar 27, 2004* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Nicolas Kiefer #44 6-4 6-2 Sebastien Grosjean #13 Match data
Aug 12, 2002 Indianapolis ATP 250 R16 Hard Sebastien Grosjean #11 7-6(4) 6-3 Nicolas Kiefer #65 Match data
Jul 14, 2000* Gstaad ATP 250 R16 Clay Sebastien Grosjean #27 6-3 6-1 Nicolas Kiefer #13 Match data
Aug 11, 1999* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Nicolas Kiefer #17 7-5 6-3 Sebastien Grosjean #33 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sebastien Grosjean #720 #4 2,865 1,960 320 236 57.6% 0 1 0 0 3 4
Nicolas Kiefer #720 #4 2,447 1,984 343 252 57.6% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sebastien Grosjean Nicolas Kiefer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1994 0–1 0.0% #1198 1,489 0 0
17 1995 3–3 50.0% #206 1,527 0 0
18 1996 7–9 43.8% #128 1,562 0 0
19 1997 0–5 0.0% #145 1,461 0 0 1997 26–16 61.9% #32 1,798 0 1
20 1998 16–19 45.7% #88 1,634 0 0 1998 31–25 55.4% #35 1,790 0 1
21 1999 35–25 58.3% #27 1,748 0 0 1999 53–21 71.6% #6 1,921 0 4
22 2000 42–27 60.9% #19 1,836 0 1 2000 30–15 66.7% #20 1,921 0 6
23 2001 48–23 67.6% #6 1,943 0 2 2001 26–25 51.0% #42 1,766 0 6
24 2002 37–20 64.9% #17 1,907 0 3 2002 19–24 44.2% #72 1,718 0 6
25 2003 34–21 61.8% #10 1,804 0 3 2003 19–17 52.8% #58 1,727 0 6
26 2004 25–14 64.1% #15 1,821 0 3 2004 32–19 62.7% #21 1,897 0 6
27 2005 29–20 59.2% #25 1,842 0 3 2005 31–22 58.5% #22 1,854 0 6
28 2006 26–21 55.3% #28 1,767 0 3 2006 14–8 63.6% #48 1,843 0 6
29 2007 19–18 51.4% #53 1,765 0 4 2007 19–12 61.3% #49 1,893 0 6
30 2008 7–15 31.8% #170 1,650 0 4 2008 20–16 55.6% #38 1,876 0 6
31 2009 1–5 16.7% #677 1,620 0 4 2009 12–16 42.9% #116 1,757 0 6
32 2010 1–3 25.0% #722 1,578 0 4 2010 1–3 25.0% #722 1,717 0 6