H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Sebastien Grosjean vs Richey Reneberg H2H: 1-0
Sebastien Grosjean holds a 1–0 lead over Richey Reneberg in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sebastien Grosjean leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sebastien Grosjean won the 1999 Indianapolis second round 7-6(4) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 48
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 60
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 1999 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Sebastien Grosjean | 7-6(4) 6-3 | Richey Reneberg | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sebastien Grosjean | #720 | #4 | 2,865 | 1,960 | 320 | 236 | 57.6% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
| Richey Reneberg | #867 | #20 | 1,333 | 1,923 | 305 | 261 | 53.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sebastien Grosjean | Richey Reneberg | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1997 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #145 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1998 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #88 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #337 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1999 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #27 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #79 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2000 | 42–27 | 60.9% | #19 | 1,836 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #128 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2001 | 48–23 | 67.6% | #6 | 1,943 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #80 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2002 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #17 | 1,907 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #23 | 1,821 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2003 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #10 | 1,804 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #27 | 1,805 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2004 | 25–14 | 64.1% | #15 | 1,821 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #95 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2005 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #25 | 1,842 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 37–26 | 58.7% | #30 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2006 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #28 | 1,767 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #34 | 1,809 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2007 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #53 | 1,765 | 0 | 4 | 1995 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #57 | 1,773 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2008 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #170 | 1,650 | 0 | 4 | 1996 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #32 | 1,815 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2009 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #677 | 1,620 | 0 | 4 | 1997 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #73 | 1,682 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #722 | 1,578 | 0 | 4 | 1998 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #154 | 1,596 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #202 | 1,626 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #573 | 1,631 | 0 | 3 |