H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC
Sebastien Lareau vs Mark Knowles H2H: 3-0
Sebastien Lareau holds a 3–0 lead over Mark Knowles in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Sebastien Lareau leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sebastien Lareau won the 2000 Indianapolis second round 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 53
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
BAH
Age 54
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2000 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Sebastien Lareau | 6-4 7-5 | Mark Knowles | Match data |
| Apr 25, 1996* | Seoul | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Sebastien Lareau | 6-4 6-2 | Mark Knowles | Match data |
| Apr 17, 1996* | Tokyo | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Sebastien Lareau | 6-1 6-2 | Mark Knowles | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sebastien Lareau | #1,018 | #76 | 622 | 1,719 | 82 | 120 | 40.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mark Knowles | #1,400 | #96 | 484 | 1,623 | 23 | 51 | 31.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sebastien Lareau | Mark Knowles | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1015 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #728 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #430 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1991 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #349 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1992 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #197 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #291 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1993 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #131 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #258 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 3–13 | 18.8% | #119 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #173 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #136 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #231 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1996 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #105 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #139 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1997 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #187 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #117 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1998 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #79 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #363 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1999 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #102 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #273 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2000 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #124 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #223 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2001 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #229 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #350 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 |