H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 14:15 UTC
S. Lareau vs M. Petchey H2H: 1-1
S. Lareau and M. Petchey are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, S. Lareau won the 1996 Indianapolis second round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 53
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 55
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 1996 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | S. Lareau | 7-5 6-2 | M. Petchey | Match data |
| Apr 21, 1994* | Seoul | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | M. Petchey | 6-0 3-6 7-6(6) | S. Lareau | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S. Lareau | #1,018 | #76 | 622 | 1,719 | 82 | 120 | 40.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| M. Petchey | #1,313 | #80 | 552 | 1,597 | 34 | 64 | 34.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | S. Lareau | M. Petchey | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1015 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #954 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #382 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1991 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #349 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #307 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1992 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #197 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #240 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1993 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #131 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #255 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 3–13 | 18.8% | #119 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #245 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #136 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #121 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1996 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #105 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #120 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1997 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #187 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #149 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1998 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #79 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #212 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1999 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #102 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #159 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2000 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #124 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #587 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2001 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #229 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |