H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Sergio Casal vs Danie Visser H2H: 1-1
Sergio Casal and Danie Visser are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Danie Visser won the 1987 Key Biscayne second round 4-6 6-3 7-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 63
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 64
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 1987* | Key Biscayne | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Danie Visser | 4-6 6-3 7-6 6-2 | Sergio Casal | Match data |
| Aug 30, 1986* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Sergio Casal | 6-2 6-1 6-3 | Danie Visser | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sergio Casal | #1,267 | #31 | 122 | 1,793 | 110 | 137 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Danie Visser | #749 | #59 | 191 | 1,709 | 92 | 129 | 41.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sergio Casal | Danie Visser | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1981 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1982 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #174 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1983 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #93 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1984 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #177 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #138 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1985 | 18–10 | 64.3% | #38 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #72 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1986 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #62 | 1,748 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #145 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1987 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #92 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #83 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1988 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #77 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #136 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1989 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #184 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #143 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1990 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #263 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #141 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #623 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #197 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1992 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #727 | 1,541 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #405 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #973 | 1,527 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |