H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Sergio Casal vs Danie Visser H2H: 1-1

Sergio Casal and Danie Visser are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Danie Visser won the 1987 Miami Open round of 64 4-6 6-3 7-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sergio Casal
ESP Age 63 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Danie Visser
RSA Age 65 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Danie Visser #94 4-6 6-3 7-6 6-2 Sergio Casal #52 Match data Feb 25, 1987* R64 Miami Open ATP 500 Hard
Sergio Casal #92 6-2 6-1 6-3 Danie Visser #110 Match data Aug 30, 1986* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sergio Casal #1,267 #31 122 1,794 112 138 44.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Danie Visser #749 #59 191 1,709 92 129 41.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sergio Casal Danie Visser
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1981 3–3 50.0% — 1,535 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1982 3–9 25.0% — 1,497 0 0 1981 1–2 33.3% — 1,506 0 0
20 1983 11–11 50.0% #70 1,638 0 0 1982 7–18 28.0% #93 1,483 0 0
21 1984 2–9 18.2% #177 1,564 0 0 1983 7–12 36.8% #138 1,495 0 0
22 1985 18–10 64.3% #38 1,713 0 1 1984 13–14 48.1% #72 1,618 0 0
23 1986 23–28 45.1% #62 1,749 0 1 1985 13–20 39.4% #145 1,642 0 0
24 1987 20–25 44.4% #92 1,647 0 1 1986 15–14 51.7% #83 1,676 0 0
25 1988 21–20 51.2% #77 1,659 0 1 1987 11–16 40.7% #136 1,635 0 0
26 1989 8–12 40.0% #184 1,621 0 1 1988 9–13 40.9% #143 1,591 0 0
27 1990 3–7 30.0% #263 1,583 0 1 1989 10–13 43.5% #141 1,621 0 0
28 1991 0–1 0.0% #623 1,571 0 1 1990 5–5 50.0% #197 1,652 0 0
29 1992 0–2 0.0% #727 1,542 0 1 1991 1–2 33.3% #405 1,642 0 0
32 1995 0–1 0.0% #973 1,528 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sergio Casal Danie Visser
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1981 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1982 — — — — 3 8 11 27.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1981 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1983 — — — — 10 10 20 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1982 3 7 10 30.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1984 — — — — 2 9 11 18.2% — — — — — — — — 1983 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1985 3 2 5 60.0% 15 7 22 68.2% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 7 9 16 43.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
23 1986 6 5 11 54.5% 10 15 25 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 1985 6 9 15 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1987 9 8 17 52.9% 9 13 22 40.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1986 8 8 16 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1988 4 5 9 44.4% 14 9 23 60.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1987 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 8 11 19 42.1% — — — — — — — — 1988 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
27 1990 0 1 1 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1989 6 9 15 40.0% — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
28 1991 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 1992 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1991 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
32 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 22 25 47 46.8% 75 91 166 45.2% 1 5 6 16.7% 14 17 31 45.2% — 51 67 118 43.2% 4 15 19 21.1% 31 36 67 46.3% 6 11 17 35.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Sergio Casal Danie Visser
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
28 1991 1/1 4.0 1.0 70.9% 62.3% 28.0% 40.0% 45.5% 52.3% 41.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 1992 2/2 3.0 2.0 62.5% 68.8% 46.9% 48.3% 15.4% 60.4% 32.9% 1991 3/3 7.3 1.3 63.8% 64.9% 49.3% 70.2% 8.3% 59.1% 26.6%
32 1995 1/1 2.0 2.0 52.8% 59.6% 47.6% 22.2% 35.7% 53.9% 43.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 4/250 3.0 1.8 62.2% 64.8% 42.4% 39.7% 28.0% 56.8% 37.9% — 3/221 7.3 1.3 63.8% 64.9% 49.3% 70.2% 8.3% 59.1% 26.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sergio Casal Danie Visser
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1981 1536 115.2 — — — — — +32 — 46.7% -0.27 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — +0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1982 1497 117.6 — — — — — +38 — 32.4% -0.94 3–3 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.8 +0.23 1981 1507 107.7 — — — — +43 — — 50.0% -0.63 0–2 2–0 — +0.01
20 1983 1638 140.0 — — — — — +13 — 44.1% -0.47 7–2 (78%) 3–3 (50%) 106.3 -1.00 1982 1483 114.0 — — — — +43 -13 +61 39.7% -0.84 1–9 (10%) 9–7 (56%) 95.2 +1.20
21 1984 1564 123.0 — — — — — +21 — 29.6% -1.26 0–4 (0%) 1–3 (25%) 94.8 -0.10 1983 1496 111.4 — — — — +39 -38 — 42.3% -0.17 3–5 (38%) 5–5 (50%) 100.5 +1.59
22 1985 1713 135.2 — — — — -121 +5 — 56.7% +0.12 9–2 (82%) 6–3 (67%) 111.0 +0.39 1984 1618 134.7 — — — — -27 -150 +4 50.0% -0.04 7–7 (50%) 5–8 (38%) 101.4 -0.82
23 1986 1749 136.6 — — — — -18 -92 — 44.7% -0.22 8–6 (57%) 5–11 (31%) 98.8 +0.11 1985 1643 120.9 — — — — -82 — +8 42.9% -0.37 4–6 (40%) 7–11 (39%) 97.0 +0.53
24 1987 1647 135.2 — — — — +61 -24 — 44.9% -0.11 11–9 (55%) 2–14 (13%) 94.2 -1.44 1986 1676 124.7 — — — — -64 — +38 51.4% -0.11 4–5 (44%) 6–7 (46%) 101.0 +0.55
25 1988 1660 133.3 — — — — -27 +68 — 48.6% +0.08 11–3 (79%) 3–6 (33%) 104.8 -0.37 1987 1635 124.7 — — — — -10 — +22 43.4% -0.35 3–4 (43%) 10–7 (59%) 102.4 -1.15
26 1989 1621 124.9 — — — — — +62 — 38.3% -0.55 3–4 (43%) 1–4 (20%) 96.3 +0.44 1988 1591 112.9 — — — — -2 — +38 41.4% -0.38 4–3 (57%) 3–6 (33%) 99.9 +1.16
27 1990 1583 111.7 — — — — +37 +46 — 36.0% -0.76 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.23 1989 1621 129.7 — — — — -23 — +15 44.4% -0.11 4–4 (50%) 7–4 (64%) 102.8 -0.79
28 1991 1572 102.0 -0.71 +0.79 0.876 46.9% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — -0.07 1990 1652 113.0 — — — — -22 — -22 51.9% -0.11 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 100.2 -0.54
29 1992 1542 97.6 -0.73 -1.59 0.832 47.0% — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 1–1 — +0.16 1991 1643 108.2 -0.83 -4.21 0.649 43.6% -23 — — 37.5% -1.25 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.02
32 1995 1528 99.2 +0.02 -2.49 0.953 48.5% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1794 138.7 -0.54 -1.22 0.876 47.4% -2 +8 — 44.2% -0.29 56–40 (58%) 25–50 (33%) 96.7 -0.44 — 1710 127.9 -0.83 -4.21 0.649 43.6% -19 -50 +21 44.9% -0.31 33–48 (41%) 58–58 (50%) 100.6 +0.80

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.