H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Sergio Casal vs Tomas Smid H2H: 2-2
Sergio Casal and Tomas Smid are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Tomas Smid leads 2–0 on clay, while Sergio Casal leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Sergio Casal won the 1988 Vienna third round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 63
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 70
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 1988* | Vienna | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Sergio Casal | 6-4 6-4 | Tomas Smid | Match data |
| Jul 9, 1987* | Gstaad | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Tomas Smid | 6-2 6-4 | Sergio Casal | Match data |
| Feb 18, 1987* | Indian Wells | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Sergio Casal | 6-7 6-2 6-3 | Tomas Smid | Match data |
| Apr 21, 1983* | Bournemouth | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Tomas Smid | 6-3 6-3 | Sergio Casal | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sergio Casal | #1,267 | #31 | 122 | 1,793 | 110 | 137 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Tomas Smid | #975 | #11 | 28 | 1,998 | 497 | 318 | 61.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sergio Casal | Tomas Smid | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1981 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1982 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #174 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1983 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #154 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1984 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #177 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #67 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1985 | 18–10 | 64.3% | #38 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #36 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1986 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #62 | 1,748 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 50–25 | 66.7% | #27 | 1,870 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1987 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #92 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #23 | 1,950 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1988 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #77 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 54–28 | 65.9% | #28 | 1,864 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1989 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #184 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 62–28 | 68.9% | #24 | 1,901 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 1990 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #263 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 59–30 | 66.3% | #17 | 1,902 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #623 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #16 | 1,840 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | 1992 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #727 | 1,541 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #19 | 1,804 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #54 | 1,721 | 0 | 10 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #31 | 1,729 | 0 | 10 |
| 32 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #973 | 1,527 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #115 | 1,656 | 0 | 10 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #453 | 1,537 | 0 | 10 |