H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Sergiy Stakhovsky vs Lukasz Kubot H2H: 2-1
Sergiy Stakhovsky holds a 2–1 lead over Lukasz Kubot in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Sergiy Stakhovsky leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Sergiy Stakhovsky won the 2014 Indian Wells Masters first round 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
POL
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 2014* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Sergiy Stakhovsky | 6-4 7-5 | Lukasz Kubot | Match data |
| Jan 20, 2011* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Sergiy Stakhovsky | 6-3 6-4 6-4 | Lukasz Kubot | Match data |
| Jan 7, 2010* | Doha | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Lukasz Kubot | 6-2 7-6(5) | Sergiy Stakhovsky | Match data |
| Jun 9, 2008 | Queen's Club | ATP 500 | Q2 | Grass | Lukasz Kubot | 3-6 7-6(6) 6-4 | Sergiy Stakhovsky | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sergiy Stakhovsky | #678 | #31 | 1,263 | 1,839 | 145 | 195 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Lukasz Kubot | #1,054 | #41 | 977 | 1,870 | 82 | 118 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Sergiy Stakhovsky | Lukasz Kubot | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #335 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #219 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #195 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #125 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #92 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,730 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,750 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #70 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,743 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #62 | 1,707 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #74 | 1,721 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 13–26 | 33.3% | #103 | 1,739 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #72 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,679 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #170 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #58 | 1,686 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #471 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #62 | 1,715 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #109 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #122 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #134 | 1,649 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,576 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,568 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,530 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |